Dougados M, Combe B, Cantagrel A, Goupille P, Olive P, Schattenkirchner M, Meusser S, Paimela L, Rau R, Zeidler H, Leirisalo-Repo M, Peldan K
Institut de Rhumatologie, Hardy B, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Apr;58(4):220-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.58.4.220.
To investigate the potential clinical benefit of a combination therapy.
205 patients fulfilling the ACR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), not treated with disease modifying antirheumatoid drugs previously, with an early (< or = 1 year duration), active (Disease Activity Score (DAS) > 3.0), rheumatoid factor and/or HLA DR 1/4 positive disease were randomised between sulphasalazine (SASP) 2000 (maximum 3000) mg daily (n = 68), or methotrexate (MTX) 7.5 (maximum 15) mg weekly (n = 69) or the combination (SASP + MTX) of both (n = 68).
The mean changes in the DAS during the one year follow up of the study was -1.15, -0.87, -1.26 in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX group respectively (p = 0.019). However, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of either EULAR good responders 34%, 38%, 38% or ACR criteria responders 59%, 59%, 65% in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX group respectively. Radiological progression evaluated by the modified Sharp score was very modest in the three groups: mean changes in erosion score: +2.4, +2.4, +1.9, in narrowing score: +2.3, +2.1, +1.6 and in total damage score: +4.6, +4.5, +3.5, in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX groups respectively. Adverse events occurred more frequently in the SASP + MTX group 91% versus 75% in the SASP and MTX group (p = 0.025). Nausea was the most frequent side effect: 32%, 23%, 49% in the SASP, MTX, and SASP + MTX groups respectively (p = 0.007).
This study suggests that an early initiation therapy of disease modifying drug seems to be of benefit. However, this study was unable to demonstrate a clinically relevant superiority of the combination therapy although several outcomes were in favour of this observation. The tolerability of the three treatment modalities seems acceptable.
研究联合治疗的潜在临床益处。
205例符合美国风湿病学会(ACR)类风湿关节炎(RA)标准的患者,此前未接受过改善病情抗风湿药物治疗,病程早期(≤1年)、病情活动(疾病活动评分(DAS)>3.0)、类风湿因子和/或HLA DR 1/4阳性,被随机分为三组:柳氮磺胺吡啶(SASP)组,每日2000(最大3000)mg(n = 68);甲氨蝶呤(MTX)组,每周7.5(最大15)mg(n = 69);联合治疗组(SASP + MTX)(n = 68)。
在研究的一年随访期间,DAS的平均变化在SASP组、MTX组和SASP + MTX组分别为-1.15、-0.87、-1.26(p = 0.019)。然而,在欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)良好反应者方面,SASP组、MTX组和SASP + MTX组分别为34%、38%、38%,在美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准反应者方面分别为59%、59%、65%,均无统计学显著差异。通过改良Sharp评分评估的放射学进展在三组中都非常轻微:SASP组、MTX组和SASP + MTX组的侵蚀评分平均变化分别为+2.4、+2.4、+1.9,狭窄评分平均变化分别为+2.3、+2.1、+1.6,总损伤评分平均变化分别为+4.6、+4.5、+3.5。不良事件在SASP + MTX组中发生频率更高,为91%,而SASP组和MTX组为75%(p = 0.025)。恶心是最常见的副作用:SASP组、MTX组和SASP + MTX组分别为32%、23%、49%(p = 0.007)。
本研究表明,早期开始使用改善病情药物治疗似乎有益。然而,尽管有几个结果支持这一观察,但本研究未能证明联合治疗在临床上具有显著优势。三种治疗方式的耐受性似乎可以接受。