• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为讨论癌症护理临终问题创造空间。

Creating space to discuss end-of-life issues in cancer care.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States.

Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Feb;102(2):216-222. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.002
PMID:30007763
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6571206/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Analyze entire oncology clinical visits and examine instances in which oncologists have to break the bad news that patients' treatments are no longer effective.

METHODS

Using conversation analysis we examine 128 audio recorded conversations between terminal cancer patients, their caregivers, and oncologists.

RESULTS

When oncologists break the bad news that a patient's treatment is no longer effective, they often use a conversational device we call an "exhausted current treatment" (ECT) statement, which avoids discussing prognosis in favor of further discussing treatment options. Analysis suggests that improving and prioritizing patient-centered care and shared decision making is possible if we first understand the social organization of clinical visits.

CONCLUSIONS

ECT statements and their movement towards discussing treatment options means that opportunities are bypassed for patients and caregivers to process or discuss scan results, and their prognostic implications.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

When oncologists and patients, by fixating on treatment options, bypass opportunities to discuss the meaning of scan results, they fail to realize other goals associated with prognostic awareness. Talking about what scans mean may add minutes to that part of the clinic visit, but can create efficiencies that conserve overall time. We recommend that oncologists, after delivering scan news, ask, "Would you like discuss what this means?".

摘要

目的

分析整个肿瘤学临床就诊过程,并研究肿瘤学家不得不告知患者治疗不再有效的情况。

方法

我们使用会话分析方法,研究了 128 个由晚期癌症患者、他们的护理人员和肿瘤学家之间的音频记录对话。

结果

当肿瘤学家告知患者治疗不再有效的坏消息时,他们经常使用我们称之为“用尽当前治疗”(ECT)陈述的会话手段,避免讨论预后,转而进一步讨论治疗方案。分析表明,如果我们首先了解临床就诊的社会组织,就有可能改善和优先考虑以患者为中心的护理和共同决策。

结论

ECT 陈述及其向讨论治疗方案的转变意味着患者和护理人员错过了处理或讨论扫描结果及其预后影响的机会。

实践意义

当肿瘤学家和患者通过关注治疗方案而绕过讨论扫描结果意义的机会时,他们未能实现与预后意识相关的其他目标。谈论扫描结果意味着什么可能会增加该就诊部分的几分钟,但可以创造效率,从而节省整体时间。我们建议肿瘤学家在传递扫描结果后询问,“您想讨论一下这意味着什么吗?”。

相似文献

1
Creating space to discuss end-of-life issues in cancer care.为讨论癌症护理临终问题创造空间。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Feb;102(2):216-222. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
2
Communicative challenges among physicians, patients, and family caregivers in cancer care: An exploratory qualitative study in Ethiopia.癌症护理中医生、患者和家庭照顾者之间的沟通挑战:在埃塞俄比亚进行的探索性定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 13;15(3):e0230309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230309. eCollection 2020.
3
Characterizing the Nature of Scan Results Discussions: Insights Into Why Patients Misunderstand Their Prognosis.剖析扫描结果讨论的本质:洞察患者误解其预后的原因。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Mar;13(3):e231-e239. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.014621. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
4
Values and options in cancer care (VOICE): study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers.癌症护理中的价值观和选择(VOICE):一项以患者为中心的沟通和决策干预的研究设计和理论基础,该干预面向医生、晚期癌症患者及其照护者。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Apr 9;13:188. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-188.
5
Effect of a Patient-Centered Communication Intervention on Oncologist-Patient Communication, Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization in Advanced Cancer: The VOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.以患者为中心的沟通干预对晚期癌症患者与肿瘤学家沟通、生活质量及医疗保健利用的影响:VOICE随机临床试验
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):92-100. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4373.
6
The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) for patients with prognosis <12 months: protocol for a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial.针对预后小于12个月患者的海德堡里程碑式沟通方法(MCA):一项包括随机对照试验的混合方法研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Aug 14;19(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2814-1.
7
The impact of the caregiver-oncologist relationship on caregiver experiences of end-of-life care and bereavement outcomes.照顾者与肿瘤医生关系对照顾者临终关怀体验和丧亲结局的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4219-4225. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05185-2. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
8
Oncologists' Perceptions of Strategies for Discussing the Cost of Care with Cancer Patients and the Meaning of Those Conversations.肿瘤学家对与癌症患者讨论医疗费用策略的看法,以及这些对话的意义。
Health Commun. 2024 Jun;39(7):1343-1357. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2212419. Epub 2023 May 15.
9
"Speaking-for" and "speaking-as": pseudo-surrogacy in physician-patient-companion medical encounters about advanced cancer.“代言”与“以……身份发言”:晚期癌症医患陪伴式医疗接触中的假性代孕
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jul;96(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
Encouraging early discussion of life expectancy and end-of-life care: A randomised controlled trial of a nurse-led communication support program for patients and caregivers.鼓励对预期寿命和临终护理进行早期讨论:一项针对患者及其护理人员的由护士主导的沟通支持项目的随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Feb;67:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
How do patient information documents present dialysis and conservative kidney management? A document analysis.患者信息文件如何呈现透析和保守肾脏管理?一项文献分析。
Clin Kidney J. 2025 May 12;18(6):sfaf136. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Communicating treatment options to older patients with advanced kidney disease: a conversation analysis study.与晚期肾病老年患者沟通治疗方案:一项会话分析研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2024 Nov 21;25(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03855-w.
3
The Role of Health Care Communication in Treatment Outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment Recommendations as Actions.治疗建议作为行动。
Health Commun. 2018 Nov;33(11):1335-1344. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1350913. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
2
End-of-Life Care Matters: Palliative Cancer Care Results in Better Care and Lower Costs.生命末期关怀至关重要:姑息治疗癌症可改善护理并降低成本。
Oncologist. 2017 Apr;22(4):361-368. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0277. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
3
Characterizing the Nature of Scan Results Discussions: Insights Into Why Patients Misunderstand Their Prognosis.剖析扫描结果讨论的本质:洞察患者误解其预后的原因。
医疗保健沟通在治疗结果中的作用。
Annu Rev Linguist. 2023 Jan;9:233-252. doi: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030521-054400. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
4
Miscommunication in Cancer Care-Do You Hear What I Hear?癌症护理中的沟通障碍——你听到我所听到的了吗?
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Oct 1;9(10):1335-1336. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2944.
5
Oncologist approaches to communicating uncertain disease status in pediatric cancer: a qualitative study.肿瘤学家在儿童癌症中沟通不确定疾病状态的方法:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):1109. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10190-6.
6
Death and the treatment imperative: Decision-making in late-stage cancer.死亡与治疗紧迫性:晚期癌症的决策制定。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Aug;306:115129. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115129. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
7
Communicating with patients and families about illness progression and end of life: a review of studies using direct observation of clinical practice.与患者及其家属就疾病进展和临终事宜进行沟通:采用临床实践直接观察法的研究综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Dec 8;20(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00876-2.
8
Mind your words: Oncologists' communication that potentially harms patients with advanced cancer: A survey on patient perspectives.留意你的言辞:肿瘤医生的沟通可能会对晚期癌症患者造成伤害:一项基于患者视角的调查。
Cancer. 2022 Mar 1;128(5):1133-1140. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34018. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
9
Discussing Prognosis with Empathy to Cancer Patients.与癌症患者共情讨论预后。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2021 Mar 14;23(4):42. doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01027-9.
10
Opportunities to Improve Shared Decision Making in Dialysis Decisions for Older Adults with Life-Limiting Kidney Disease: A Pilot Study.改善老年终末期肾病患者透析决策中共享决策的机会:一项试点研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 May;23(5):627-634. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0340. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Mar;13(3):e231-e239. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.014621. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
4
Outcomes of Prognostic Disclosure: Associations With Prognostic Understanding, Distress, and Relationship With Physician Among Patients With Advanced Cancer.预后信息披露的结果:晚期癌症患者的预后理解、痛苦程度及其与医生关系的关联
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 10;33(32):3809-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.9239. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
5
'End of life' conversations, appreciation sequences, and the interaction order in cancer clinics.“临终”对话、感激序列与癌症诊所中的互动秩序
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jan;99(1):92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
6
Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making.知识并非患者的力量:系统综述和主题综合分析患者报告的共享决策障碍和促进因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Mar;94(3):291-309. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
7
Shared understanding in psychiatrist-patient communication: association with treatment adherence in schizophrenia.精神科医生-患者沟通中的共同理解:与精神分裂症治疗依从性的关联。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
8
Patient disclosure of medical misdeeds.患者披露医疗过失。
J Health Soc Behav. 2013 Jun;54(2):221-40. doi: 10.1177/0022146513487379.
9
Initiating decision-making in neurology consultations: 'recommending' versus 'option-listing' and the implications for medical authority.在神经科会诊中启动决策制定:“推荐”与“列举选项”及其对医疗权威的影响。
Sociol Health Illn. 2013 Jul;35(6):873-90. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12000. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
10
An eHealth system supporting palliative care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial.支持非小细胞肺癌患者姑息治疗的电子健康系统:一项随机试验。
Cancer. 2013 May 1;119(9):1744-51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27939. Epub 2013 Jan 25.