• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用罗夏墨迹测验和儿童行为量表对重度烧伤儿童和青少年的心理功能进行比较。

A comparison of psychologic functioning in children and adolescents with severe burns on the Rorschach and the Child Behavior Checklist.

作者信息

Holaday M, Blakeney P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg 39406-5025.

出版信息

J Burn Care Rehabil. 1994 Sep-Oct;15(5):412-5.

PMID:7995813
Abstract

The incidence of psychologic problems in 12 children and adolescents with severe burns was examined through four similar scales on the Children's Behavior Checklist and the Rorschach. No correlations were found for any of the pairs, which were Withdrawn-Isolation Index, Somatic Complaints-Anatomy + X-ray, Anxious/Depressed-Depression Index, and Thought Disorder-Schizophrenic Index. Discrepancies were explained as both accurate reflections of patients' personalities and function of the type of assessment instrument used to determine psychologic problems. Although the statistical power of the study is limited by the small sample size, the results suggest the lack of good objective psychologic assessment tools available to this population and the need for experienced professionals to interpret test results in light of their personal knowledge of the patient.

摘要

通过儿童行为量表和罗夏墨迹测验的四个相似量表,对12名重度烧伤儿童和青少年的心理问题发生率进行了检查。在退缩-孤立指数、躯体主诉-解剖学+X射线、焦虑/抑郁-抑郁指数和思维紊乱-精神分裂症指数这几对指标中,均未发现相关性。差异被解释为既是患者个性的准确反映,也是用于确定心理问题的评估工具类型的作用。尽管该研究的统计效力因样本量小而受限,但结果表明,该人群缺乏良好的客观心理评估工具,且需要有经验的专业人员根据他们对患者的个人了解来解读测试结果。

相似文献

1
A comparison of psychologic functioning in children and adolescents with severe burns on the Rorschach and the Child Behavior Checklist.使用罗夏墨迹测验和儿童行为量表对重度烧伤儿童和青少年的心理功能进行比较。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1994 Sep-Oct;15(5):412-5.
2
[Prevalence of depressive disorders in children and adolescents attending primary care. A survey with the Aquitaine Sentinelle Network].[初级保健机构中儿童和青少年抑郁症的患病率。阿基坦哨兵网络的一项调查]
Encephale. 2003 Sep-Oct;29(5):391-400.
3
Adolescent mothers and their children: changes in maternal characteristics and child developmental and behavioral outcome at school age.青春期母亲及其子女:母亲特征的变化以及学龄期儿童的发育和行为结果
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1996 Jun;17(3):162-9.
4
Early detection of psychological problems in a population of children with enuresis: construction and validation of the Short Screening Instrument for Psychological Problems in Enuresis.在遗尿症儿童群体中早期发现心理问题:遗尿症心理问题简短筛查工具的构建与验证
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2611-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.025. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
5
The Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom (OCS) scale of the Child Behavior Checklist: a comparison between Swedish children with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder from a specialized unit, regular outpatients and a school sample.儿童行为量表的强迫症状(OCS)量表:来自专业机构的瑞典强迫症儿童、普通门诊患者和学校样本之间的比较。
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Oct;22(7):1172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.12.004. Epub 2008 Jan 5.
6
Rorschach protocols of children and adolescents with severe burns: a follow-up study.
J Pers Assess. 1998 Dec;71(3):306-21. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa7103_2.
7
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
8
A comparison of emotional/behavioural problems between Taiwanese children with cancer and healthy controls.台湾癌症患儿与健康对照组儿童情绪/行为问题的比较。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(3):304-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01925.x. Epub 2007 Oct 11.
9
Resiliency characteristics and Rorschach variables in children and adolescents with severe burns.
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1994 Sep-Oct;15(5):455-60; discussion 452-4. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199409000-00017.
10
[The value of different sources of information in evaluating psychiatric disorders in adolescence--a comparison of parental judgment and self-assessment by adolescents].[不同信息来源在评估青少年精神障碍中的价值——父母判断与青少年自我评估的比较]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 1997 Oct;46(8):566-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological aspects of paediatric burns (a clinical review).小儿烧伤的心理学方面(临床综述)
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2010 Sep 30;23(3):155-9.