Suppr超能文献

儿童行为量表的强迫症状(OCS)量表:来自专业机构的瑞典强迫症儿童、普通门诊患者和学校样本之间的比较。

The Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom (OCS) scale of the Child Behavior Checklist: a comparison between Swedish children with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder from a specialized unit, regular outpatients and a school sample.

作者信息

Ivarsson Tord, Larsson Bo

机构信息

Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway Gullhaug Torg 4B, 0484 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Oct;22(7):1172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.12.004. Epub 2008 Jan 5.

Abstract

To evaluate the discriminative power of various items as reported by parents in the OCS-scale extracted from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) problem scale and to compare findings with outcomes of previous validation studies. Children referred to a specialized child psychiatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) clinic (OCD group) (n=185) receiving a formal OCD diagnosis according to DSM IV criteria based on interviews with the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) were compared to a sample recruited from regular child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics (CPO group) (n=177). Both samples were compared to a normative school sample (SS group) and all three groups were matched for age and gender. Thirty seven CBCL items, mostly representing core internalizing symptoms and parts of the thought problem scale as well as physical and sleep problems, were first identified. Ten of these items (including all discriminative items in previous validation studies) could distinguish children with OCD from CPO patients. In a subsequent analysis, the results of a logistic regression showed that four CBCL items, "Obsessions," "Fearful and Anxious," "Compulsions," and "Worries" remained significant predictors. These four OCS items and previously used CBCL OCS-scales were further examined by means of ROC-analysis showing that the "Obsessions" and "Compulsions" CBCL items were the strongest predictors. These two CBCL items performed well as screens for OCS symptoms in children and adolescents and the addition of similar CBCL items did not further increase sensitivity or specificity. It is suggested that parental responses on these two items could preferably be used as screen for OCD in children and adolescents in regular child psychiatric clinics.

摘要

评估从儿童行为检查表(CBCL)问题量表中提取的OCS量表里家长报告的各类项目的区分能力,并将研究结果与之前验证研究的结果进行比较。将转诊至专门的儿童精神科强迫症(OCD)门诊的儿童(OCD组)(n = 185)与从普通儿童和青少年精神科门诊招募的样本(CPO组)(n = 177)进行比较,OCD组儿童根据DSM-IV标准,基于儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(CY-BOCS)访谈接受正式的OCD诊断。将这两个样本与一个正常学校样本(SS组)进行比较,所有三组在年龄和性别上进行匹配。首先确定了37个CBCL项目,这些项目大多代表核心内化症状、思维问题量表的部分内容以及身体和睡眠问题。其中10个项目(包括之前验证研究中的所有区分性项目)能够区分患有OCD的儿童和CPO患者。在后续分析中,逻辑回归结果显示,4个CBCL项目,即“强迫观念”“恐惧和焦虑”“强迫行为”和“担忧”仍然是显著的预测指标。通过ROC分析进一步检验了这4个OCS项目和之前使用的CBCL OCS量表,结果表明“强迫观念”和“强迫行为”这两个CBCL项目是最强的预测指标。这两个CBCL项目在筛查儿童和青少年的OCS症状方面表现良好,增加类似的CBCL项目并不会进一步提高敏感性或特异性。建议在普通儿童精神科诊所中,家长对这两个项目的回答最好用作儿童和青少年OCD的筛查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验