Suppr超能文献

为年龄歧视辩护。

In defence of ageism.

作者信息

Shaw A B

机构信息

Bradford Royal Infirmary, West Yorkshire.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):188-91, 194. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.188.

Abstract

Health care should be preferentially allocated to younger patients. This is just and is seen as just. Age is an objective factor in rationing decisions. The arguments against 'ageism' are answered. The effects of age on current methods of rationing are illustrated, and the practical applications of an age-related criterion are discussed. Ageist policies are in current use and open discussion of them is advocated.

摘要

医疗保健应优先分配给年轻患者。这是公正的,并且被视为公正。年龄是配给决策中的一个客观因素。针对“年龄歧视”的反对观点得到了回应。阐述了年龄对当前配给方法的影响,并讨论了与年龄相关标准的实际应用。年龄歧视政策目前正在使用,提倡对此进行公开讨论。

相似文献

1
In defence of ageism.
J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):188-91, 194. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.188.
2
Protecting elderly people: flaws in ageist arguments.
BMJ. 1995 May 6;310(6988):1179-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6988.1179.
3
Allocating healthcare by QALYs: the relevance of age.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1996 Fall;5(4):534-45. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000743x.
4
Age as a basis for allocating lifesaving medical resources: an ethical analysis.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1988 Fall;13(3):405-23. doi: 10.1215/03616878-13-3-405.
5
Age as a basis for healthcare rationing. Support for agist policies.
Drugs Aging. 1996 Dec;9(6):403-5. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199609060-00003.
6
Tetraplegics and the justice of resource allocation.
Paraplegia. 1993 Mar;31(3):143-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.1993.26.
7
Some ethical costs of rationing.
Law Med Health Care. 1992 Spring-Summer;20(1-2):57-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01173.x.
8
Resource allocation--what is the first priority?
J Med Ethics. 1992 Jun;18(2):99-100. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.2.99.
9
Ethical constraints on rationing medical care by age.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989 Nov;37(11):1067-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb06923.x.
10
The rationing debate. Rationing health care by age.
BMJ. 1997 Mar 15;314(7083):820-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7083.820.

引用本文的文献

1
Covid-19 and age discrimination: benefit maximization, fairness, and justified age-based rationing.
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Mar;26(1):3-11. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10118-8. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
2
[Ethics and monetary values. Influence of economical aspects on decision-making in intensive care].
Anaesthesist. 2008 Nov;57(11):1075-82; quiz 1083. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1443-6.
3
Capabilities and health.
J Med Ethics. 2005 May;31(5):299-303. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.008706.
4
Health care rationing in the aged: ethical and clinical perspectives.
Drugs Aging. 1999 Jul;15(1):37-47. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199915010-00004.
5
Age as a basis for healthcare rationing. Arguments against agism.
Drugs Aging. 1996 Dec;9(6):399-402. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199609060-00002.
6
In defence of ageism.
J Med Ethics. 1994 Dec;20(4):270-1. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.4.270-a.
7
Protecting elderly people: flaws in ageist arguments.
BMJ. 1995 May 6;310(6988):1179-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6988.1179.
8
In defence of ageism.
J Med Ethics. 1995 Apr;21(2):117-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.2.117-b.

本文引用的文献

1
The fortysomething barrier: medicine and age discrimination.
BMJ. 1993 Mar 6;306(6878):637-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6878.637.
2
Priority setting in the NHS: reports from six districts.
BMJ. 1993 Aug 14;307(6901):435-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.435.
3
Prioritising health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience.
BMJ. 1993 Aug 7;307(6900):373-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6900.373.
4
Rationing in practice: the case of in vitro fertilisation.
BMJ. 1993 Jun 5;306(6891):1521-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6891.1521.
5
Justice and the economics of terminal illness.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1988 Aug-Sep;18(4):34-40.
6
Is rationing inevitable?
N Engl J Med. 1990 Jun 21;322(25):1809-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199006213222510.
7
Age as a criterion for rationing health care.
N Engl J Med. 1990 Jun 21;322(25):1813-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199006213222512.
8
Age and other determinants of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Q J Med. 1991 Dec;81(296):1005-10. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/81.3.1005.
9
"Futility" as a criterion in limiting treatment.
N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 22;327(17):1239; author reply 1241. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210223271712.
10
The problem with futility.
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jun 4;326(23):1560-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199206043262310.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验