为年龄歧视辩护。
In defence of ageism.
作者信息
Shaw A B
机构信息
Bradford Royal Infirmary, West Yorkshire.
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):188-91, 194. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.188.
Abstract
Health care should be preferentially allocated to younger patients. This is just and is seen as just. Age is an objective factor in rationing decisions. The arguments against 'ageism' are answered. The effects of age on current methods of rationing are illustrated, and the practical applications of an age-related criterion are discussed. Ageist policies are in current use and open discussion of them is advocated.
摘要
医疗保健应优先分配给年轻患者。这是公正的，并且被视为公正。年龄是配给决策中的一个客观因素。针对“年龄歧视”的反对观点得到了回应。阐述了年龄对当前配给方法的影响，并讨论了与年龄相关标准的实际应用。年龄歧视政策目前正在使用，提倡对此进行公开讨论。
相似文献
1
In defence of ageism.为年龄歧视辩护。
J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):188-91, 194. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.188.
2
Protecting elderly people: flaws in ageist arguments.保护老年人：年龄歧视观点中的缺陷。
BMJ. 1995 May 6;310(6988):1179-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6988.1179.
3
Allocating healthcare by QALYs: the relevance of age.通过质量调整生命年分配医疗保健资源：年龄的相关性。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1996 Fall;5(4):534-45. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000743x.
4
Age as a basis for allocating lifesaving medical resources: an ethical analysis.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1988 Fall;13(3):405-23. doi: 10.1215/03616878-13-3-405.
5
Age as a basis for healthcare rationing. Support for agist policies.年龄作为医疗资源分配的依据。对年龄歧视政策的支持。
Drugs Aging. 1996 Dec;9(6):403-5. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199609060-00003.
6
Tetraplegics and the justice of resource allocation.四肢瘫痪者与资源分配的公正性
Paraplegia. 1993 Mar;31(3):143-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.1993.26.
7
Some ethical costs of rationing.定量分配的一些伦理代价。
Law Med Health Care. 1992 Spring-Summer;20(1-2):57-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01173.x.
8
Resource allocation--what is the first priority?资源分配——首要优先事项是什么？
J Med Ethics. 1992 Jun;18(2):99-100. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.2.99.
9
Ethical constraints on rationing medical care by age.按年龄分配医疗资源的伦理约束。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989 Nov;37(11):1067-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb06923.x.
10
The rationing debate. Rationing health care by age.配给制辩论。按年龄配给医疗保健服务。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 15;314(7083):820-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7083.820.
引用本文的文献
1
Covid-19 and age discrimination: benefit maximization, fairness, and justified age-based rationing.Covid-19 与年龄歧视：利益最大化、公平性和合理的基于年龄的配给。
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Mar;26(1):3-11. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10118-8. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
2
[Ethics and monetary values. Influence of economical aspects on decision-making in intensive care].[伦理与金钱价值。经济因素对重症监护决策的影响]
Anaesthesist. 2008 Nov;57(11):1075-82; quiz 1083. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1443-6.
3
Capabilities and health.能力与健康。
J Med Ethics. 2005 May;31(5):299-303. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.008706.
4
Health care rationing in the aged: ethical and clinical perspectives.老年人医疗保健资源分配：伦理与临床视角
Drugs Aging. 1999 Jul;15(1):37-47. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199915010-00004.
5
Age as a basis for healthcare rationing. Arguments against agism.
Drugs Aging. 1996 Dec;9(6):399-402. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199609060-00002.
6
In defence of ageism.为年龄歧视辩护。
J Med Ethics. 1994 Dec;20(4):270-1. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.4.270-a.
7
Protecting elderly people: flaws in ageist arguments.保护老年人：年龄歧视观点中的缺陷。
BMJ. 1995 May 6;310(6988):1179-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6988.1179.
8
In defence of ageism.为年龄歧视辩护。
J Med Ethics. 1995 Apr;21(2):117-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.2.117-b.
9
Ensuring equity and quality of care for elderly people: a critique of the College report.确保老年人护理的公平性和质量：对学院报告的批判
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995 Mar-Apr;29(2):89-91.
本文引用的文献
1
The fortysomething barrier: medicine and age discrimination.四十多岁的障碍：医学与年龄歧视。
BMJ. 1993 Mar 6;306(6878):637-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6878.637.
2
Priority setting in the NHS: reports from six districts.英国国家医疗服务体系中的优先事项设定：六个地区的报告。
BMJ. 1993 Aug 14;307(6901):435-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.435.
3
Prioritising health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience.在资源有限时代对医疗服务进行优先排序：俄勒冈州的经验。
BMJ. 1993 Aug 7;307(6900):373-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6900.373.
4
Rationing in practice: the case of in vitro fertilisation.实践中的配给：体外受精的案例
BMJ. 1993 Jun 5;306(6891):1521-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6891.1521.
5
Justice and the economics of terminal illness.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1988 Aug-Sep;18(4):34-40.
6
Is rationing inevitable?资源配给是不可避免的吗？
N Engl J Med. 1990 Jun 21;322(25):1809-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199006213222510.
7
Age as a criterion for rationing health care.
N Engl J Med. 1990 Jun 21;322(25):1813-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199006213222512.
8
Age and other determinants of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.年龄及其他决定院内心肺复苏后生存情况的因素。
Q J Med. 1991 Dec;81(296):1005-10. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/81.3.1005.
9
"Futility" as a criterion in limiting treatment.“无意义”作为限制治疗的一项标准。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 22;327(17):1239; author reply 1241. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210223271712.
10
The problem with futility.徒劳的问题。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jun 4;326(23):1560-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199206043262310.
Zotero 插件