Suppr超能文献

英国国家医疗服务体系中的优先事项设定:六个地区的报告。

Priority setting in the NHS: reports from six districts.

作者信息

Ham C

机构信息

Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham.

出版信息

BMJ. 1993 Aug 14;307(6901):435-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.435.

Abstract

District health authorities must make choices on the use of their funds and the priorities that should be pursued. In future they may be able to place greater weight on the views of local people and evidence on cost effectiveness of different services. This paper reviews developments in a recent study of six district health authorities with an interest in priority setting. On the whole they had avoided excluding services entirely from their contracts; they experienced difficulty in comparing different services, and made more progress by analysing priorities within individual service areas than by comparing quite different services. The absence of information to guide priority setting was a major problem. A major effort had been made to involve the public in decision making, and a range of tools and methods developed to support work on priority setting. The impact of the work done so far has varied; district health authorities are still at an early stage in developing their work on priority setting.

摘要

地区卫生当局必须对资金的使用以及应优先考虑的事项做出选择。未来,他们或许能够更加重视当地民众的意见以及不同服务的成本效益证据。本文回顾了近期对六个关注确定优先事项的地区卫生当局进行研究的进展情况。总体而言,它们避免在合同中完全排除某些服务;在比较不同服务方面遇到困难,并且通过分析各个服务领域内的优先事项取得的进展,要比比较截然不同的服务取得的进展更大。缺乏指导确定优先事项的信息是一个主要问题。已经做出重大努力让公众参与决策,并开发了一系列工具和方法来支持确定优先事项的工作。到目前为止所开展工作的影响各不相同;地区卫生当局在开展确定优先事项的工作方面仍处于早期阶段。

相似文献

3
Public opinion and purchasing.公众舆论与购买行为。
BMJ. 1992 Mar 14;304(6828):680-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6828.680.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验