Suppr超能文献

使用第二代P值进行序贯监测,通过监测频率控制I型错误。

Sequential monitoring using the Second Generation P-Value with Type I error controlled by monitoring frequency.

作者信息

Chipman Jonathan J, Greevy Robert A, Mayberry Lindsay, Blume Jeffrey D

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Cancer Biostatistics, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah.

Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt, Vanderbilt Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt.

出版信息

Am Stat. 2025;79(1):50-60. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2024.2356109. Epub 2024 Jun 28.

Abstract

The Second Generation P-Value (SGPV) measures the overlap between an estimated interval and a composite hypothesis of parameter values. We develop a sequential monitoring scheme of the SGPV (SeqSGPV) to connect study design intentions with end-of-study inference anchored on scientific relevance. We build upon Freedman's "Region of Equivalence" (ROE) in specifying scientifically meaningful hypotheses called Pre-specified Regions Indicating Scientific Merit (PRISM). We compare PRISM monitoring versus monitoring alternative ROE specifications. Error rates are controlled through the PRISM's indifference zone around the point null and monitoring frequency strategies. Because the former is fixed due to scientific relevance, the latter is a targettable means for designing studies with desirable operating characters. An affirmation step to stopping rules improves frequency properties including the error rate, the risk of reversing conclusions under delayed outcomes, and bias.

摘要

第二代P值(SGPV)衡量估计区间与参数值的复合假设之间的重叠程度。我们开发了一种SGPV的序贯监测方案(SeqSGPV),以将研究设计意图与基于科学相关性的研究结束时的推断联系起来。我们在弗里德曼的“等效区域”(ROE)基础上,指定了称为“表明科学价值的预先指定区域”(PRISM)的具有科学意义的假设。我们比较了PRISM监测与替代ROE规范的监测。通过PRISM围绕点零假设的无差异区域和监测频率策略来控制错误率。由于前者因科学相关性而固定,后者是设计具有理想操作特征的研究的可设定手段。对停止规则的确认步骤改善了频率特性,包括错误率、延迟结果下结论逆转的风险和偏差。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test.贝叶斯估计取代了 t 检验。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):573-603. doi: 10.1037/a0029146. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
10
A comparison of two phase I trial designs.两种I期试验设计的比较。
Stat Med. 1994 Sep 30;13(18):1799-806. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131802.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验