Badger L W, deGruy F V, Hartman J, Plant M A, Leeper J, Ficken R, Maxwell A, Rand E, Anderson R, Templeton B
School of Social Work, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
Arch Fam Med. 1994 Oct;3(10):899-907. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.10.899.
To measure primary care physicians' attitudes toward psychosocial issues, determine their relationship to the style of the medical interview, and assess whether attitudes and interview behaviors lead to correct diagnosis in patients with depression.
Physicians were videotaped while interviewing four patients standardized with criteria symptoms of major depression. Physicians were unaware of the mental health focus of the study.
Patient examining rooms.
Physicians were eligible for recruitment if they were board certified or eligible in family practice or internal medicine, practiced primary care medicine, and were listed in regional directories. Standardized patients were recruited from the community.
Attitudes toward psychosocial issues (measured by the Physician Belief Scale), interview content (measured by review of the videotaped encounters), interview behaviors (measured by the Interaction Analysis System for Interview Evaluation), and a listing of depression in the differential diagnosis (determined by physician debriefing interviews).
Forty-seven community-based practitioners participated. Forty-eight percent of interviews resulted in a diagnosis of depression. Physician Belief Scale scores were not significantly correlated with patient-centered interviewing, psychosocial questions, inquiry about depression symptoms, or a depression diagnosis. Longer interviews were more likely to result in a depression diagnosis.
High interest in psychosocial issues was not associated with patient-centered interviewing behaviors, questions about psychosocial or depression symptoms, or depression diagnoses. However, certain patient-centered interviewing behaviors, particularly those defined as "affective," did lead to the recognition of depression.
测量基层医疗医生对社会心理问题的态度,确定其与医学访谈风格的关系,并评估这些态度和访谈行为是否能导致对抑郁症患者的正确诊断。
在医生对四名符合重度抑郁症标准症状的患者进行访谈时进行录像。医生并不知晓该研究关注心理健康。
患者检查室。
若医生获得委员会认证或有资格从事家庭医学或内科,从事基层医疗工作且在地区名录中有登记,则有资格被招募。标准化患者从社区招募。
对社会心理问题的态度(通过医生信念量表测量)、访谈内容(通过审查录像访谈测量)、访谈行为(通过访谈评估互动分析系统测量)以及鉴别诊断中的抑郁症列表(通过医生汇报访谈确定)。
47名社区执业医生参与。48%的访谈得出抑郁症诊断。医生信念量表得分与以患者为中心的访谈、社会心理问题、对抑郁症状的询问或抑郁症诊断均无显著相关性。访谈时间越长,越有可能得出抑郁症诊断。
对社会心理问题的高度关注与以患者为中心的访谈行为、关于社会心理或抑郁症状的问题或抑郁症诊断无关。然而,某些以患者为中心的访谈行为,尤其是那些被定义为“情感性”的行为,确实能促成对抑郁症的识别。