Thejls H, Gnarpe J, Gnarpe H, Larsson P G, Platz-Christensen J J, Ostergaard L, Victor A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gävle Central Hospital, Sweden.
Genitourin Med. 1994 Oct;70(5):300-3. doi: 10.1136/sti.70.5.300.
To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of chlamydia culture, direct immunofluorescence (DFA), direct enzyme immunoassay (EIA), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and serology by defining positive culture or at least two positive non-culture tests as true positive.
Three gynaecological departments located in separate areas of Sweden.
All pregnant women requesting abortion during a six month period were included. In cases with unconfirmed non-culture tests, reculture with multiple passage and PCR on the culture transport medium was performed for confirmation. Serum was analysed for chlamydial antibodies type IgG, IgM and IgA using microimmunofluorescence.
18 of 419 (4.3%) patients were positive for chlamydia according to the defined criteria. Twelve of 419 (2.9%) were positive in standard culture (primary inoculation). The sensitivity of standard culture, DFA, EIA and PCR were 66.7%, 77.8%, 64.7% and 71.4% respectively. The specificity 100% (by definition), 99.5%, 100%, 100% respectively. The positive predictive value 100% (by definition), 87.5%, 100%, 100% respectively. Negative predictive value 98.5%, 99.0%, 98.5%, 98.9% respectively. Serum IgG titre of > or = 64 and > or = 1024 gave positive predictive values of 10% and 21% respectively.
When an expanded gold standard is used, the specificity and positive predictive value of the non-culture tests used are comparable with that of standard culture even in this low prevalence population. Standard culture underestimated the chlamydia prevalence by 33%. The prevalence found represents a decrease from 10 to 2.9% of culture verified chlamydia during four years in comparable populations. Chlamydial antibodies of certain immunological classes are not necessarily present in cases with chlamydia.
通过将衣原体培养阳性或至少两项非培养检测结果阳性定义为真阳性,评估衣原体培养、直接免疫荧光法(DFA)、直接酶免疫测定法(EIA)、聚合酶链反应(PCR)和血清学检测的诊断效能。
位于瑞典不同地区的三个妇科科室。
纳入在六个月期间要求堕胎的所有孕妇。对于非培养检测结果未确诊的病例,进行多次传代再培养,并在培养物运输培养基上进行PCR以确诊。使用微量免疫荧光法分析血清中的衣原体IgG、IgM和IgA抗体类型。
根据既定标准,419例患者中有18例(4.3%)衣原体检测呈阳性。419例中有12例(2.9%)在标准培养(初次接种)中呈阳性。标准培养、DFA、EIA和PCR的敏感性分别为66.7%、77.8%、64.7%和71.4%。特异性分别为100%(根据定义)、99.5%、100%、100%。阳性预测值分别为100%(根据定义)、87.5%、100%、100%。阴性预测值分别为98.5%、99.0%、98.5%、98.9%。血清IgG滴度≥64和≥1024时,阳性预测值分别为10%和21%。
当使用扩展的金标准时,即使在这个低患病率人群中,所使用的非培养检测的特异性和阳性预测值与标准培养相当。标准培养低估了衣原体患病率33%。所发现的患病率代表了在四年中可比人群中经培养证实的衣原体患病率从10%降至2.9%。衣原体感染病例中不一定存在某些免疫类别的衣原体抗体。