Thériault J
Université du Québec à Montréal, Department of Sexology, Canada.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1994;38(2):153-70. doi: 10.2190/YQAU-H8ER-2N4K-HATM.
This study seeks to verify if the work-to-retirement process meets the requirements inherent to the Psychosocial Transitions Model. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations are used to verify if pre-, intra-, and post-retirement periods are different from one another when the individual's internal organization is examined. The experimental group (n = 17, age = 65) takes IPAT, LSI-A, and clinical interviews evaluations at pre-, intra-, and post-retirement measurement times. The control group (n = 22, age = 65), used to verify the test-retest effect, takes these evaluations only at the post-retirement session. Variance analysis (ANOVA) show, at a quantitative level that the retirement transition triggers observable changes in anxiety levels. A posteriori analysis (HELMERT) shows that these operate significantly between the pre- and intra-retirement times. The content analysis of interviews shows, at a qualitative level, observable changes in pre-post-retirement preoccupations. These include death thoughts.
本研究旨在验证从工作到退休的过程是否符合心理社会转型模型所固有的要求。采用定量和定性评估方法，在考察个体内部组织时，验证退休前、退休中及退休后的时期是否彼此不同。实验组（n = 17，年龄 = 65岁）在退休前、退休中和退休后测量阶段接受IPAT、LSI - A和临床访谈评估。对照组（n = 22，年龄 = 65岁）用于验证重测效应，仅在退休后阶段接受这些评估。方差分析（ANOVA）在定量层面表明，退休过渡会引发焦虑水平的明显变化。事后分析（HELMERT）表明，这些变化在退休前和退休中阶段之间有显著作用。访谈的内容分析在定性层面显示，退休前后的关注点有明显变化。这些变化包括对死亡的思考。
