Hallett M A, Cannella D
Department of Criminal Justice Administration, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro 37132.
J Homosex. 1994;26(4):111-34. doi: 10.1300/J082v26n04_07.
This research examines the extent to which HIV-positive voices are marginalized in the mainstream versus the "alternative" press. The central claim of this research is that news media format considerations, constructed around what has come to be called "media logic," leave persons who are HIV-positive with comparatively little voice in the mainstream press. By utilizing techniques of content analysis, the research examines 535 major HIV/AIDS-specific stories published in two oppositional papers toward an assessment of the level of HIV-positive voice in each outlet. While arguments of "homophobia" have been previously used to explain bias in mainstream HIV/AIDS-coverage, this article asserts that "hetero-centric" bias is, in fact, embedded in the routinized practices of mainstream "news production." The article concludes by suggesting that successful future HIV/AIDS activism demands a recognition of "media logic" and an adoption of its tactics.
本研究考察了主流媒体与“另类”媒体中,艾滋病毒呈阳性者的声音被边缘化的程度。本研究的核心观点是,围绕所谓“媒体逻辑”构建的新闻媒体形式考量,使得艾滋病毒呈阳性者在主流媒体中的发声相对较少。通过运用内容分析技术,该研究对两家对立报纸上发表的535篇主要的特定艾滋病毒/艾滋病报道进行了考察,以评估每个媒体中艾滋病毒呈阳性者声音的水平。虽然此前有人用“恐同症”观点来解释主流媒体对艾滋病毒/艾滋病报道的偏见,但本文认为,事实上,“以异性为中心”的偏见已根深蒂固于主流“新闻制作”的常规做法之中。文章最后指出,未来成功的艾滋病毒/艾滋病激进主义行动需要认识到“媒体逻辑”并采用其策略。