Lear J T, Lawrence I G, Pohl J E, Burden A C
Leicester Royal Infirmary.
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Mar-Apr;28(2):143-7.
We reviewed the ward admission notes of 211 Indian and 192 European patients admitted over a period of 12 months to a coronary care unit. More Indian patients had myocardial infarctions (34% vs 27%, p < 0.05); they were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (47% vs 14%, p < 0.001), but less likely to smoke (19% vs 67%, p < 0.001). Fewer Indian patients were treated with thrombolysis (49% vs 80%, p < 0.001), late presentation being the principal reason (62% vs 40%, p < 0.05). The referral rates for exercise stress testing and cardiac catheterisation were not significantly lower for Indian patients. The Indian patient admitted into a coronary care unit is more likely to have had a myocardial infarction and yet less likely to receive care comparable to that of his European counterpart.
我们回顾了在12个月期间入住冠心病监护病房的211名印度患者和192名欧洲患者的病房入院记录。更多的印度患者发生过心肌梗死(34%对27%,p<0.05);他们患糖尿病的可能性更大(47%对14%,p<0.001),但吸烟的可能性较小(19%对67%,p<0.001)。接受溶栓治疗的印度患者较少(49%对80%,p<0.001),就诊延迟是主要原因(62%对40%,p<0.05)。印度患者进行运动负荷试验和心导管检查的转诊率并没有显著降低。入住冠心病监护病房的印度患者更有可能发生过心肌梗死,但接受的治疗却比欧洲患者少。