[Influence of the place of measurement and of the person who performs it on the control and diagnosis of arterial hypertension].

The use of ambulatory monitorization of blood pressure has shown the importance of the alarm reaction or white coat reaction and its conditioning factors in some patients. The influence of place (medical facility or home) and person who performs the procedure (doctor or nurse) on the taking of blood pressure is studied with regard to degree of control and/or disease diagnosis. The design is descriptive with a cross-section analysis. The sample is made up of 100 people-50 with hypertension and 50 who came to the center for reasons unrelated to blood pressure and were selected at random. Of the results obtained, the findings below are noteworthy. The number of controlled hypertension cases is fewer in the medical consultation (18 percent) or with nursing staff (22 percent) than in the patients' homes, whether the procedure is performed by the doctor (54 percent) or by the nurse (58 percent) (p = 0.000004). In the group of individuals who sought consultation, the number of hypertension cases detected by random measurements is fewer in the medical consultation (66 percent) than by the nursing staff (48 percent) and lowers significantly at home (p = 0.000001), whether taken by the doctor (22 percent) or by the nurse (20 percent). It is confirmed that figures for blood pressure at home are lower than those registered in the consultation, be they taken by the doctor or the nurse. We believe that the elevation in blood pressure is not exclusively attributable to the doctor and suggest that place where the procedure is performed is more important than the person who performs the procedure.