Suppr超能文献

自测家庭血压对动态高血压的预测作用

Self-measured home blood pressure in predicting ambulatory hypertension.

作者信息

Mansoor George A, White William B

机构信息

Section of Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2004 Nov;17(11 Pt 1):1017-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.06.015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physicians are commonly uncertain whether a person with office blood pressure (BP) around 140/90 mm Hg actually has hypertension. This is primarily because of BP variability. One approach is to perform self-measured home BP and determine if home BP is elevated. There is a general agreement that if home BP is >/=135/85 mm Hg, then antihypertensive therapy may be commenced. However, some persons with home BP below this cut-off will have ambulatory hypertension. We therefore prospectively study the role of home BP in predicting ambulatory hypertension in persons with stage 1 and borderline hypertension.

METHODS

We studied in a cross-sectional way home and ambulatory BP in a group of 48 patients with at least two elevated office BP readings. The group was free of antihypertensive drug therapy for at least 4 weeks and performed 7 days of standardized self-BP measurements at home. We examined the relationships of the three BP methods and also defined a threshold (using receiver operating curves) for home BP that captures 80% of ambulatory hypertensives (awake BP >/=135/85 mm Hg).

RESULTS

Office systolic BP (145 +/- 13 mm Hg) was significantly higher than awake (139 +/- 12 mm Hg, P = .013) and home (132 +/- 11 mm Hg, P < .001) BP. Office diastolic BP (88 +/- 4 mm Hg) was higher than home diastolic BP (80 +/- 8 mm Hg, P < .001) but not different from awake diastolic BP (88 +/- 8 mm Hg, P = .10). Home BP had a higher correlation (compared with office BP) with ambulatory BP. The home BP-based white coat effect correlated with ambulatory BP-based white coat effect (r = 0.83, P = .001 for systolic BP; r = 0.68, P = .001 for diastolic BP). The threshold for home BP of 80% sensitivity in capturing ambulatory hypertension was 125/76 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary data suggest that a lower self-monitored home BP threshold should be used (to exclude ambulatory hypertension) in patients with borderline office hypertension.

摘要

背景

医生通常不确定诊室血压(BP)在140/90 mmHg左右的人是否真的患有高血压。这主要是因为血压存在变异性。一种方法是进行家庭自测血压,并确定家庭血压是否升高。普遍认为,如果家庭血压≥135/85 mmHg,那么可以开始抗高血压治疗。然而,一些家庭血压低于此临界值的人会有动态高血压。因此,我们前瞻性地研究家庭血压在预测1期高血压和临界高血压患者动态高血压中的作用。

方法

我们对一组48例至少有两次诊室血压读数升高的患者进行了家庭血压和动态血压的横断面研究。该组患者至少4周未接受抗高血压药物治疗,并在家中进行了7天的标准化自测血压。我们研究了三种血压测量方法之间的关系,并使用受试者工作特征曲线确定了一个能识别80%动态高血压患者(清醒时血压≥135/85 mmHg)的家庭血压阈值。

结果

诊室收缩压(145±13 mmHg)显著高于清醒时收缩压(139±12 mmHg,P = 0.013)和家庭收缩压(132±11 mmHg,P < 0.001)。诊室舒张压(88±4 mmHg)高于家庭舒张压(80±8 mmHg,P < 0.001),但与清醒时舒张压(88±8 mmHg,P = 0.10)无差异。家庭血压与动态血压的相关性高于诊室血压。基于家庭血压的白大衣效应与基于动态血压的白大衣效应相关(收缩压r = 0.83,P = 0.001;舒张压r = 0.68,P = 0.001)。家庭血压在识别动态高血压时灵敏度为80%的阈值为125/76 mmHg。

结论

我们的初步数据表明,对于临界诊室高血压患者,应采用更低的家庭自测血压阈值(以排除动态高血压)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验