Shay S S, Johnson L F
Department of Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1994 Jul;89(7):992-1002.
To determine whether two dissimilar groups characterized by 24-h esophageal pH monitoring would have individual reflux events that occur under the same or different circumstances when challenged by a meal and monitored in different postures. These groups consisted of upright refluxers without esophagitis (n = 10) versus biopositional refluxers with esophagitis (n = 8).
Our evaluation consisted of a questionnaire completed prior to simultaneous manometry and pH monitoring. This monitoring was conducted over a 120-min period that incorporated the upright and recumbent postures both before and after a meal. Three of our four criteria for reflux were independent of a classic pH event.
From the questionnaire, it was apparent that dyspeptic symptoms almost always occurred in the upright refluxers. In addition, provocation for their heartburn had atypical characteristics regarding posture, and their degree of regurgitation was intensified by the postprandial state. During dual monitoring, the upright posture and the meal provoked an increase in frequency of reflux in the upright refluxers, as opposed to only recumbency in the bipositional refluxers. Moreover, reflux events in the upright refluxers usually were associated with Valsalva maneuvers and were recognized as symptoms, two features that were less true in the bipositional refluxers. A similar percentage of reflux events occurred over a low basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and after a lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, in both groups.
The two groups manifested distinctively different reflux characteristics, presumably due to dissimilar mechanisms.
通过24小时食管pH监测确定两组不同特征的人群在进食刺激并采用不同体位监测时,其个体反流事件是在相同还是不同情况下发生。这两组人群分别为无食管炎的直立位反流者(n = 10)和有食管炎的双体位反流者(n = 8)。
我们的评估包括在同步测压和pH监测前完成一份问卷。监测在120分钟内进行,涵盖进食前后的直立位和卧位。我们所采用的四项反流标准中有三项与经典的pH事件无关。
从问卷中明显看出,消化不良症状几乎总是出现在直立位反流者中。此外,他们烧心的诱发在体位方面具有非典型特征,且其反流程度在餐后状态下会加重。在双重监测期间,直立位反流者中,直立位和进食会使反流频率增加,而双体位反流者仅在卧位时反流频率增加。此外,直立位反流者的反流事件通常与瓦尔萨尔瓦动作相关且被识别为症状,这两个特征在双体位反流者中不太明显。两组中,在基础食管下括约肌压力较低时以及食管下括约肌松弛后发生反流事件的百分比相似。
两组表现出明显不同的反流特征,可能是由于机制不同。