Suppr超能文献

[新型单针技术与当前双针技术用于细胞分离的结果比较]

[Results of cell separation with new single needle techniques in comparison with a current dual needle technique].

作者信息

Moog R, Müller N

机构信息

Institut für Transfusionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen, BRD.

出版信息

Infusionsther Transfusionsmed. 1994 Apr;21(2):86-90.

PMID:8019114
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In plateletpheresis, new single-needle techniques have been introduced for the cell separators A 201 and AS 104. These techniques were compared with the well established CS 3000 Plus cell separator, which uses the continuous flow system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Donation time, ACD consumption, platelet yield, separation efficiency, erythrocyte and leukocyte contamination were studied in different protocols with the dual- and single-needle procedure.

RESULTS

Total amount of thrombocytes and separation efficacy were lowest with the A 201 device. The separation efficiency was best with the single-needle version of the AS 104 separator due to reprocession of the blood during the return cycle to the centrifuge. Leukocyte contamination was lowest with the standard procedure of the CS 3000 Plus device.

CONCLUSIONS

The single-needle technique of the AS 104 blood cell separator resulted in sufficient platelet collection. The purity of the platelet concentrates collected with the A 201 and AS 104 machine has to be improved.

摘要

背景

在血小板单采术中,已为A 201和AS 104血细胞分离机引入了新的单针技术。将这些技术与成熟的采用连续流动系统的CS 3000 Plus血细胞分离机进行了比较。

材料与方法

采用双针和单针程序,在不同方案中研究了献血时间、ACD消耗量、血小板产量、分离效率、红细胞和白细胞污染情况。

结果

使用A 201设备时,血小板总量和分离效果最低。由于在血液返回离心机的循环过程中进行了再处理,AS 104分离机的单针版本分离效率最佳。CS 3000 Plus设备的标准程序白细胞污染最低。

结论

AS 104血细胞分离机的单针技术可采集到足够的血小板。用A 201和AS 104机器采集的血小板浓缩物的纯度有待提高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验