Suppr超能文献

[三种细胞分离器的比较]

[Comparison of 3 types of cell separators].

作者信息

Moog R, Holtmann G, Holtmann M, Luboldt W

机构信息

Blutspende- und Transfusionsdienst, Universitätsklinikum Essen.

出版信息

Beitr Infusionsther. 1990;26:123-6.

PMID:1703810
Abstract

The aim of the present investigation was to compare the efficiency of three commercially available cell separators with respect to thrombocyte yields. In addition, advantages and disadvantages of the different cell separator types were studied. There was no difference in the total number of platelets harvested by the different cell separators. In contrast the thrombocyte count of packages from the V 50 device was significantly lower as compared with the others (p = 0.05). We conclude that the cell separators tested are comparable with respect to the efficiency of processing platelet concentrates. However, the larger amount of plasma of the V 50 might be a disadvantage in some circumstances. The AS 104 has advantages in the handling and the duration of cell separation. In addition it offers technical improvements such as control of the ACD flow by a separate adjustable pump and a hemolysis detector.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较三种市售细胞分离器在血小板产量方面的效率。此外,还研究了不同类型细胞分离器的优缺点。不同细胞分离器采集的血小板总数没有差异。相比之下,V 50设备包装中的血小板计数与其他设备相比显著更低(p = 0.05)。我们得出结论,所测试的细胞分离器在处理血小板浓缩物的效率方面具有可比性。然而,在某些情况下,V 50的血浆量较大可能是一个缺点。AS 104在操作和细胞分离持续时间方面具有优势。此外,它还提供了技术改进,如通过单独的可调泵控制ACD流量和溶血检测器。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验