• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

招募高危女性参与一项乳腺癌健康促进试验。

Recruiting high risk women into a breast cancer health promotion trial.

作者信息

Lerman C, Rimer B K, Daly M, Lustbader E, Sands C, Balshem A, Masny A, Engstrom P

机构信息

Lombardi Cancer Research Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994 Apr-May;3(3):271-6.

PMID:8019378
Abstract

This study sought to identify factors that facilitate or hinder participation in a breast cancer health promotion trial among high-risk women. The subjects were 271 women ages 35 years and older who had a family history of breast cancer in at least one first-degree relative. All subjects were eligible for participation in a randomized trial which compares breast cancer risk counseling with general health counseling. Structured telephone interviews evaluated demographic characteristics, risk factors, risk perceptions, breast cancer concerns, and past screening practices. The results showed that education level was a key determinant of the importance of these factors in participation. Logistic regression modeling indicated that women with a high school education or less were most likely to participate if: (a) their relatives' diagnoses had greatly increased their perceptions of their personal risks [OR (OR) = 4.1], particularly if they perceived that risk to be very high (OR for interaction = 6.4); and (b) if they were ages 40-49 years versus 35-39 or 50 + years (OR = 2.6). By contrast, among women with education beyond high school, participation was predicted by (a) marital status (OR = 2.6), (b) employment (OR = 0.03 for employed), (c) number of affected relatives (OR = 0.07 for 1 versus 2 first-degree relatives), and (d) previous biopsy (OR = 0.42). These findings suggest that recruitment strategies that tailor messages to women's educational levels might be most effective.

摘要

本研究旨在确定促进或阻碍高危女性参与乳腺癌健康促进试验的因素。研究对象为271名年龄在35岁及以上、至少有一位一级亲属患有乳腺癌家族史的女性。所有受试者均有资格参与一项随机试验,该试验将乳腺癌风险咨询与一般健康咨询进行比较。通过结构化电话访谈评估人口统计学特征、风险因素、风险认知、对乳腺癌的担忧以及过去的筛查行为。结果表明,教育水平是这些因素在参与度方面重要性的关键决定因素。逻辑回归模型显示,高中及以下学历的女性如果符合以下条件则最有可能参与:(a) 亲属的诊断极大地增加了她们对自身个人风险的认知 [比值比(OR)= 4.1],特别是当她们认为风险非常高时(交互作用的OR = 6.4);以及 (b) 她们年龄在40 - 49岁之间,而不是35 - 39岁或50岁及以上(OR = 2.6)。相比之下,在高中学历以上的女性中,参与度可由以下因素预测:(a) 婚姻状况(OR = 2.6),(b) 就业情况(就业者的OR = 0.03),(c) 受影响亲属的数量(1位一级亲属与2位一级亲属相比的OR = 0.07),以及 (d) 既往活检情况(OR = 0.42)。这些发现表明,根据女性教育水平量身定制信息的招募策略可能最为有效。

相似文献

1
Recruiting high risk women into a breast cancer health promotion trial.招募高危女性参与一项乳腺癌健康促进试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994 Apr-May;3(3):271-6.
2
Participation in a women's breast cancer risk counseling trial. Who participates? Who declines? High Risk Breast Cancer Consortium.参与一项女性乳腺癌风险咨询试验。谁参与了?谁拒绝了?高危乳腺癌联盟。
Cancer. 1996 Jun 1;77(11):2348-55. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2348::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO;2-W.
3
Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions.参与乳腺癌易感性检测方案:招募来源、利他主义及家庭参与对女性决策的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):377-83.
4
The effect of physician recommendation on enrollment in the Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Trial.医生推荐对乳腺癌化学预防试验入组情况的影响。
Prev Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5 Pt 1):713-9. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0349.
5
Participation in breast cancer risk counseling among women with a family history.有家族病史的女性参与乳腺癌风险咨询情况。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Jul;8(7):581-5.
6
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
7
Breast cancer risk assessment in a mammography screening program and participation in the IBIS-II chemoprevention trial.在乳腺 X 光筛查计划中进行乳腺癌风险评估以及参与 IBIS-II 化学预防试验。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 May;121(1):101-10. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0845-8. Epub 2010 Mar 21.
8
Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making.有乳腺癌家族史的健康女性:定制的遗传咨询干预对风险认知、知识及绝经治疗决策的影响
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Sep;15(7):843-56. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.843.
9
Breast cancer prevention in community clinics: will low-income Latina patients participate in clinical trials?社区诊所中的乳腺癌预防:低收入拉丁裔患者会参与临床试验吗?
Prev Med. 2005 Jun;40(6):611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.004.
10
Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge.女性对乳腺癌风险基因检测的兴趣:社会人口统计学和知识的影响
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Jan;11(1):89-95.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.支持女性进行乳腺癌筛查决策的共享决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 10;5(5):CD013822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013822.pub2.
2
Uncertainty related to multigene panel testing for cancer: a qualitative study on counsellors' and counselees' views.癌症多基因检测相关的不确定性:关于咨询师和咨询对象观点的定性研究
J Community Genet. 2019 Apr;10(2):303-312. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0393-1. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
3
What is it about a cancer diagnosis that would worry people? A population-based survey of adults in England.
癌症诊断会让人担心什么?一项基于英格兰成年人的人群调查。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 24;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3963-4.
4
Will they participate? Predicting patients' response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department.他们会参与吗?预测儿科急诊科患者对临床试验邀请的反应。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jul;23(4):671-80. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv216. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
5
Use of a patient-entered family health history tool with decision support in primary care: impact of identification of increased risk patients on genetic counseling attendance.在初级保健中使用带有决策支持的患者录入式家族健康史工具:识别风险增加患者对遗传咨询就诊率的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2015 Feb;24(1):179-88. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9753-0. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
6
Attitudes Toward Cancer Clinical Trial Participation in Young Adults with a History of Cancer and a Healthy College Student Sample: A Preliminary Investigation.对有癌症病史的年轻人和健康大学生样本参与癌症临床试验的态度:一项初步调查。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;3(1):20-27. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2013.0030.
7
Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.对有家族性乳腺癌风险的个体进行癌症遗传风险评估。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD003721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003721.pub3.
8
An experimental test of the effect of incentives on recruitment of ethnically diverse colorectal cancer cases and their first-degree relatives into a research study.一项关于激励措施对招募不同族裔的结直肠癌病例及其一级亲属参与研究的效果的实验测试。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Oct;18(10):2620-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0299. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
9
Predictors of refusal during a multi-step recruitment process for a randomized controlled trial of arthritis education.一项关节炎教育随机对照试验多步骤招募过程中拒绝参与的预测因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.06.017.
10
Clinical characterization and risk profile of individuals seeking genetic counseling for hereditary breast cancer in Brazil.巴西遗传性乳腺癌基因咨询个体的临床特征与风险概况
J Genet Couns. 2007 Jun;16(3):363-71. doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9073-0. Epub 2007 Feb 23.