Coupland R M
Medical Division, International Committee of The Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMJ. 1994 Jun 25;308(6945):1693-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6945.1693.
The nature of modern conflicts precludes adequate medical care for most people wounded in wars. The traditional military approach of echeloned care for those wounded on the battlefield has limited relevance. I present an alternative, epidemiological approach whereby some effective care may reach many more. For a surgical facility to have a positive impact by using surgical and anaesthetic competence there must be access to the wounded; security for staff and patients; and a functioning hospital infrastructure. These all depend on respect for the first Geneva convention. Early hospital admission for urgent surgery is not so important if there is adequate first aid beforehand. The hospitals of the International Committee of the Red Cross have provided surgical care for thousands of wounded people by fulfilling these conditions. People wounded in modern conflicts would fare better if these priorities were recognised and less emphasis was placed on the more spectacular aspects of surgical care that benefit only a few.
现代冲突的性质使得大多数战争伤员无法得到充分的医疗救治。传统的战场伤员分级护理军事方法相关性有限。我提出一种替代性的流行病学方法,通过这种方法可以让更多伤员得到有效救治。一个外科设施若要凭借手术和麻醉能力产生积极影响,必须能够接触到伤员;保障工作人员和患者的安全;以及具备运转良好的医院基础设施。而这些都依赖于对《日内瓦第一公约》的尊重。如果事先有足够的急救措施,那么尽早入院进行紧急手术就不那么重要了。红十字国际委员会的医院通过满足这些条件,为数千名伤员提供了外科治疗。如果这些优先事项得到认可,减少对仅惠及少数人的外科护理中更引人注目的方面的重视,那么在现代冲突中受伤的人们将会得到更好的救治。