Williams G D, Proudfit A H, Quinn E A, Campbell K E
CSR, Incorporated, Washington DC 20005.
Addiction. 1994 Apr;89(4):413-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00915.x.
This paper examines differences in quantity-frequency (QF) measures of alcohol consumption from the 1988 US National Health Interview Survey. Three methods--global QF, beverage-specific QF, and beverage-specific QF with drink size (QFS)--were used to estimate the average daily ethanol consumption (ADC) of current drinkers. These ADC estimates then were used to categorize drinkers into light, moderate or heavier drinking levels. Total prevalence estimates of heavier drinking were not significantly different among men, but were significantly higher with the QFS measure among women. All mean ADC scores were significantly different for both sexes. The global QF showed the lowest mean consumption, followed by the higher beverage-specific QF and QFS measures. Adding beverage type and drink size to the QF measures increased mean ADC scores for both men and women. However, moderately high correlations (0.84 for men and 0.88 for women) were found with ADC scores from the beverage-specific QF and QFS measures.
本文研究了1988年美国国家健康访谈调查中酒精消费的数量-频率(QF)测量方法的差异。使用了三种方法——总体QF、特定饮料QF和考虑饮料容量的特定饮料QF(QFS)——来估计当前饮酒者的日均乙醇消费量(ADC)。这些ADC估计值随后被用于将饮酒者分为轻度、中度或重度饮酒水平。重度饮酒的总体患病率估计在男性中没有显著差异,但在女性中,QFS测量方法得出的患病率显著更高。男女的所有平均ADC得分均存在显著差异。总体QF显示的平均消费量最低,其次是较高的特定饮料QF和QFS测量值。在QF测量方法中加入饮料类型和饮料容量会提高男性和女性的平均ADC得分。然而,特定饮料QF和QFS测量方法的ADC得分之间存在中等偏高的相关性(男性为0.84,女性为0.88)。