Kronick J B, Frewen T C, Kissoon N, Lee R, Sommerauer J F, Reid W D, Casier S, Boyle K
Paediatric Critical Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 1996 Feb;12(1):23-6. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199602000-00007.
To compare the therapeutic interventions provided to newborn and pediatric patients by a dedicated combined neonatal pediatric critical care transport team.
From November 1987 through December 1989 we prospectively compared the number of therapeutic interventions performed by the critical care transport team on newborns and pediatric patients. The transport team (critical care physician [PL3 or greater], pediatric respiratory therapist, critical care nurse), recorded all therapeutic interventions, including both procedural and pharmacologic, for 213 newborn and 149 pediatric consecutive transports. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance or chi 2 statistic.
All patients were admitted to either the pediatric or the neonatal intensive care unit, and over 80% of both age groups received assisted ventilation. Newborns commonly suffered from respiratory diseases (159/213), while pediatric patients suffered from respiratory (52/149), central nervous system (28/149), and traumatic conditions (37/149). Airway maintenance procedural interventions (intubation, ventilation) were the commonest in both groups, although more frequent in neonates. Neonates received antibiotics and morphine (P < 0.05) while pediatric patients received anticonvulsants and respiratory drugs (P < 0.05) more frequently. Newborns received significantly more interventions than pediatric patients (average 3.56 vs 2.93, P < 0.05). Newborns also received significantly more procedural interventions (2.06 vs 1.36, P = < 0.05) including intubation (34.7% vs 15.4%, P < 0.05) and the initiation of mechanical ventilation (38% vs 22%, P < 0.05).
Overall, newborns received more interventions, including intubation, and ventilation from the transport team than did pediatric patients. Our data suggest that combined pediatric neonatal transport teams should be prepared to intervene in a wide range of conditions from preterm respiratory distress to the multiply traumatized adolescent.
比较由专门的新生儿与儿科重症监护转运团队为新生儿和儿科患者提供的治疗干预措施。
从1987年11月至1989年12月,我们前瞻性地比较了重症监护转运团队对新生儿和儿科患者实施的治疗干预措施的数量。转运团队(重症监护医师[PL3或更高职称]、儿科呼吸治疗师、重症监护护士)记录了213例新生儿和149例儿科患者连续转运过程中的所有治疗干预措施,包括操作和药物治疗。数据采用方差分析或卡方检验进行分析。
所有患者均入住儿科或新生儿重症监护病房,两个年龄组中超过80%的患者接受了辅助通气。新生儿常见呼吸系统疾病(159/213),而儿科患者患有呼吸系统疾病(52/149)、中枢神经系统疾病(28/149)和创伤性疾病(37/149)。气道维护操作干预(插管、通气)在两组中最为常见,尽管在新生儿中更频繁。新生儿更频繁地接受抗生素和吗啡治疗(P<0.05),而儿科患者更频繁地接受抗惊厥药和呼吸药物治疗(P<0.05)。新生儿接受的干预措施明显多于儿科患者(平均3.56次对2.93次,P<0.05)。新生儿接受的操作干预也明显更多(2.06次对1.36次,P<0.05),包括插管(34.7%对15.4%,P<0.05)和开始机械通气(38%对22%,P<0.05)。
总体而言,新生儿从转运团队接受的干预措施更多,包括插管和通气,比儿科患者多。我们的数据表明,联合的儿科新生儿转运团队应准备好对从早产呼吸窘迫到多重创伤青少年等广泛病症进行干预。