May A C, Johnson M S
Department of Crystallography, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK.
Protein Eng. 1994 Apr;7(4):475-85. doi: 10.1093/protein/7.4.475.
We introduce a completely automatic and objective procedure for the comparison of protein structures. A genetic algorithm is used to search for a near optimal solution of the rigid-body superposition of two whole protein structures. The specification of an initial set of equivalences is not required. Topological equivalences in the final structural alignment are defined by a conventional dynamic programming routine, which is commonly used to compare protein sequences. A least-squares fitting algorithm is then used to optimize the fit between the final set of equivalences. We have applied our method to the comparison of ribonucleic acid structures, as well as protein structures. The structural alignments are generally consistent with those previously published. In fact, on most occasions our method defines at least the same number of topological equivalences as other procedures, but always with a lower r.m.s. distance between them.
我们介绍了一种用于比较蛋白质结构的完全自动化且客观的程序。遗传算法用于搜索两个完整蛋白质结构刚体叠加的近似最优解。无需指定初始等效集。最终结构比对中的拓扑等效性由传统的动态规划程序定义,该程序通常用于比较蛋白质序列。然后使用最小二乘拟合算法来优化最终等效集之间的拟合。我们已将我们的方法应用于核糖核酸结构以及蛋白质结构的比较。结构比对通常与先前发表的结果一致。事实上,在大多数情况下,我们的方法定义的拓扑等效性数量至少与其他程序相同,但它们之间的均方根距离始终更低。