Robin A L, Siegel P T, Koepke T, Moye A W, Tice S
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit 48201.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1994 Apr;15(2):111-6.
Behavioral family systems therapy (BFST) was compared with ego-oriented individual therapy (EOIT) in a controlled, random-assignment investigation involving 22 young adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Each adolescent and her parents received approximately 16 months of outpatient therapy along with a common medical and dietary regimen. BFST emphasized parental control over eating and weight gain, coupled with cognitive restructuring and problem-solving communication training. EOIT emphasized building ego strength, adolescent autonomy, and insight into the emotional blocks to eating. BFST produced greater change on body-mass index than did EOIT, but both treatments produced comparable improvements on eating attitudes, body shape dissatisfaction, interoceptive awareness, depression/internalizing psychopathology, and eating-related family conflict. The implications of these results for the clinician who treats adolescents with anorexia nervosa are discussed.
在一项针对22名患有神经性厌食症的青少年的对照随机分组调查中,对行为家庭系统疗法(BFST)和自我导向个体疗法(EOIT)进行了比较。每位青少年及其父母都接受了约16个月的门诊治疗,同时采用常见的医学和饮食方案。BFST强调父母对饮食和体重增加的控制,同时进行认知重构和解决问题的沟通训练。EOIT强调增强自我力量、青少年自主性以及洞察阻碍进食的情绪障碍。与EOIT相比,BFST在体重指数方面产生了更大的变化,但两种治疗方法在饮食态度、对体型的不满、内感受觉知、抑郁/内化精神病理学以及与饮食相关的家庭冲突方面都产生了相当的改善。文中讨论了这些结果对治疗患有神经性厌食症青少年的临床医生的意义。