Andresen E M, Malmgren J A, Carter W B, Patrick D L
Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY 14642.
Am J Prev Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;10(2):77-84.
We derived and tested a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) for reliability and validity among a sample of well older adults in a large Health Maintenance Organization. The 10-item screening questionnaire, the CESD-10, showed good predictive accuracy when compared to the full-length 20-item version of the CES-D (kappa = .97, P < .001). Cutoff scores for depressive symptoms were > or = 16 for the full-length questionnaire and > or = 10 for the 10-item version. We discuss other potential cutoff values. The CESD-10 showed an expected positive correlation with poorer health status scores (r = .37) and a strong negative correlation with positive affect (r = -.63). Retest correlations for the CESD-10 were comparable to those in other studies (r = .71). We administered the CESD-10 again after 12 months, and scores were stable with strong correlation of r = .59.
我们推导并测试了流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的一个简短版本,以检验其在一家大型健康维护组织中健康老年人样本中的信度和效度。这份包含10个条目的筛查问卷,即CESD-10,与完整版20个条目的CES-D相比,显示出良好的预测准确性(kappa = 0.97,P < 0.001)。抑郁症状的截断分数,完整版问卷为≥16分,10个条目版本为≥10分。我们讨论了其他潜在的截断值。CESD-10与较差的健康状况评分呈预期的正相关(r = 0.37),与积极情绪呈强烈的负相关(r = -0.63)。CESD-10的重测相关性与其他研究相当(r = 0.71)。12个月后我们再次施测CESD-10,得分稳定,相关系数r = 0.59,相关性很强。