Leibowitz H W, Guzy L T, Peterson E, Blake P T
Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802.
Perception. 1993;22(9):1051-60. doi: 10.1068/p221051.
Examples of the inaccessibility of mental processes by means of verbal recall are described with particular reference to the accuracy of quantitative estimates of size, distance, and duration. Evidence is presented in support of the hypothesis that nonverbal retrieval techniques are more accurate than quantitative verbal estimates. Implications for the judicial process are considered.
通过言语回忆难以触及心理过程的例子，特别针对大小、距离和持续时间的定量估计的准确性进行了描述。提出了证据来支持非言语检索技术比定量言语估计更准确这一假设。还考虑了对司法程序的影响。
