Barsoum M S, Boulos F I, Aly A M, Saad M, Soliman M A, Doss W H, Zakaria S, Thakeb F
Department of Surgery, Kasr El Aini School of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.
World J Surg. 1994 Mar-Apr;18(2):273-8; discussion 278. doi: 10.1007/BF00294413.
A group of 1910 patients with acutely bleeding esophagogastric varices were managed in the Kasr El Aini sclerotherapy project; 458 of the patients (24%) were lost to follow-up. The remaining patients were studied in five groups: group I (294/401 patients), rigid versus flexible sclerotherapy; group II (254/336 patients), intravariceal versus paravariceal sclerotherapy; group III (174/227 patients), timing of initial sclerotherapy and the optimum frequency of sclerotherapy sessions; group IV (80/99 patients), splenectomy devascularization operation alone versus combined surgery with sclerotherapy; group V (650/847 patients), management of failures of and recurrences after sclerotherapy. The mean period of follow-up was 72 months. Rigid sclerotherapy was significantly superior to flexible sclerotherapy for emergency control of acute bleeding but was associated with significantly more morbidity. Paravariceal injection achieved insignificantly better initial control of bleeding and had more morbidity than intravariceal injection, which obliterated the varices in a significantly larger proportion of patients. Emergency injection of the acute bleeder should be carried out soon after admission, with sclerotherapy sessions repeated every 2 weeks. Combined sclerotherapy with splenectomy and devascularization was significantly more effective for controlling bleeding than surgery alone. Surgery should be done without delay for continued bleeding after the second attempt of sclerotherapy and in patients who rebleed after their third sclerotherapy session. Survival, however, was not significantly improved by the different modalities of sclerotherapy.
在开罗艾因夏姆斯硬化疗法项目中,对1910例急性出血性食管胃静脉曲张患者进行了治疗;458例患者(24%)失访。其余患者分为五组进行研究:第一组(294/401例患者),比较硬性与软性硬化疗法;第二组(254/336例患者),比较曲张静脉内与曲张静脉旁硬化疗法;第三组(174/227例患者),探讨初始硬化疗法的时机及硬化疗法疗程的最佳频率;第四组(80/99例患者),比较单纯脾切除去血管化手术与联合硬化疗法的手术;第五组(650/847例患者),研究硬化疗法失败及复发后的处理。平均随访期为72个月。在急性出血的紧急控制方面,硬性硬化疗法明显优于软性硬化疗法,但并发症明显更多。曲张静脉旁注射在出血的初始控制方面略好,但并发症比曲张静脉内注射更多,而曲张静脉内注射能使更大比例的患者静脉曲张闭塞。急性出血患者入院后应尽快进行紧急注射,硬化疗法疗程每2周重复一次。联合硬化疗法与脾切除及去血管化在控制出血方面比单纯手术明显更有效。对于硬化疗法第二次尝试后仍持续出血的患者以及第三次硬化疗法疗程后再出血的患者,应立即进行手术。然而,不同的硬化疗法方式并未显著提高生存率。