Eysenck H J
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, London, England.
Behav Res Ther. 1994 Jun;32(5):477-95. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)90135-x.
The outcome problem in psychotherapy has usually been studied without much regard to the theories underlying the methods used. It is suggested that theories are vital to scientific advancement, and that without them we cannot even specify criteria to judge outcomes. Numerous studies since the 1950s have in essence failed to disconfirm the view that various forms of psychotherapy do not show greater effectiveness than spontaneous remission or placebo treatment. An effort is made to clarify the nature of spontaneous remission and placebo treatment, and to discuss the consequences of the many empirical findings and meta-analyses published over the past 50 years. A theory is suggested linking spontaneous remission, placebo treatment, psychotherapy and behaviour therapy, leading to a discussion of ethical considerations and cost-effectiveness issues.
心理治疗中的疗效问题通常是在很少考虑所用方法背后理论的情况下进行研究的。有人认为,理论对科学进步至关重要,没有理论我们甚至无法确定判断疗效的标准。自20世纪50年代以来的大量研究实际上未能推翻各种形式的心理治疗并不比自然缓解或安慰剂治疗更有效的观点。本文致力于阐明自然缓解和安慰剂治疗的本质,并讨论过去50年发表的众多实证研究结果和荟萃分析的影响。提出了一种将自然缓解、安慰剂治疗、心理治疗和行为治疗联系起来的理论,进而讨论了伦理考量和成本效益问题。