Jarema G, Friederici A D
Département de linguistique, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Brain Lang. 1994 May;46(4):683-94. doi: 10.1006/brln.1994.1037.
The hypothesis that closed-class items which participate in theta-role assignment are less problematic in agrammatism than items which do not (Rizzi, 1985) is put to an empirical test. Five French-speaking agrammatic patients were tested in a sentence-picture matching paradigm to probe their comprehension of sentences containing articles, which are not involved in theta-role assignment, and of sentences containing pronouns, which in the direct object position are homophonous with articles and are theta-role assignees. Gender was used as a variable to differentiate between target and distractor. The data indicate that pronouns are significantly more difficult to process than articles. This result disconfirms the claim that the availability of grammatical information encoded in closed-class items is a function of their involvement in theta-role assignment. The present study demonstrates that the ability to process gender marked articles is generally well preserved in French-speaking agrammatic patients.
封闭类词项参与题元角色分配时,比起不参与题元角色分配的词项,在语法缺失症中问题更少(里齐,1985),这一假设接受了实证检验。五名说法语的语法缺失症患者接受了句子-图片匹配范式测试,以探究他们对包含不参与题元角色分配的冠词的句子,以及对包含代词的句子的理解,代词在直接宾语位置与冠词同音且是题元角色承担者。性别被用作区分目标和干扰项的变量。数据表明,代词比冠词的处理难度显著更高。这一结果反驳了如下观点:封闭类词项中编码的语法信息的可用性是其参与题元角色分配的函数。本研究表明,说法语的语法缺失症患者处理有性标记的冠词的能力通常保存良好。