Kacmarek R M, Mang H, Barker N, Cycyk-Chapman M C
Department of Anesthesiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 92114.
Crit Care Med. 1994 Aug;22(8):1219-26. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199408000-00004.
To determine which of a series of disposable or interchangeable positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) devices functions with the least imposition of inspiratory and expiratory work during continuous positive airway pressure.
Prospective laboratory evaluation performed on a lung model.
Research laboratory at a university medical center.
A spontaneously breathing lung model, created from a training test lung and a volume ventilator, were used to simulate a patient spontaneously breathing at a tidal volume of 0.4 L, peak inspiratory flow of 40 L/min, an inspiration/expiration ratio of 1:2, and a respiratory rate of 20 breaths/min. Ten PEEP valves attached to a continuous high-flow system were evaluated.
All of the PEEP valves studied imposed high levels of both inspiratory and expiratory work of breathing. The BE-171 and BE-142 valves (Instrumentation Industries) imposed the least amount of inspiratory work. In general, imposed inspiratory work accounted for approximately 70% to 80% of total imposed work of breathing.
All of the disposable/interchangeable PEEP valves that were studied imposed a considerable amount of both inspiratory and expiratory work, even when the continuous flow provided exceeded the peak inspiratory flow demands of the lung model. The primary reason for the high imposed work levels is the high gas-flow resistance of all of the valves studied.
确定一系列一次性或可互换的呼气末正压(PEEP)装置中,哪一种在持续气道正压通气期间对吸气和呼气功的影响最小。
在肺模型上进行的前瞻性实验室评估。
大学医学中心的研究实验室。
使用由训练测试肺和容量通气机创建的自主呼吸肺模型,模拟患者以0.4L潮气量、40L/min的吸气峰流速、1:2的吸呼比和20次/分钟的呼吸频率进行自主呼吸。对连接到持续高流量系统的10个PEEP阀进行了评估。
所有研究的PEEP阀都施加了高水平的吸气和呼气呼吸功。BE-171和BE-142阀(仪器工业公司)施加的吸气功最少。一般来说,施加的吸气功约占总呼吸功的70%至80%。
所有研究的一次性/可互换PEEP阀都施加了相当数量的吸气和呼气功,即使提供的持续流量超过了肺模型的吸气峰流速需求。所研究的所有阀门施加高功水平的主要原因是其高气流阻力。