Sturmey P
Abilene State School.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1994 Jun;24(3):293-304. doi: 10.1007/BF02172228.
Reviewed the psychometric properties, treatment utility, and conceptual basis of psychometric instruments used to identify the functions of aberrant behaviors in people with developmental disabilities. The instruments reviewed are the Motivational Assessment Scale (Durand & Crimmins, 1992), the Motivation Analysis Rating Scale (Weisheler, Hanson, Chamberlain, & Thompson, 1985), the Functional Analysis Interview Form (O'Neill, Horner, Albin, Storey, & Sprague, 1990), and the Functional Analysis Checklist (Van Houten & Rolider, 1991). Recurrent problems in this area include the lack of replicability of the reliability of these instruments, difficulties in summarizing the information from these assessment devices, difficulties in translating the assessment into treatment packages, strong individual differences in the functions of behavior problems, and, finally, issues relating to the concurrent validity, both across these instruments and across other assessment methods.
回顾了用于识别发育障碍患者异常行为功能的心理测量工具的心理测量特性、治疗效用和概念基础。所回顾的工具包括动机评估量表（杜兰德和克里明斯，1992年）、动机分析评定量表（韦舍勒、汉森、张伯伦和汤普森，1985年）、功能分析访谈表（奥尼尔、霍纳、阿尔宾、斯托里和斯普拉格，1990年）以及功能分析检查表（范霍滕和罗利德，1991年）。该领域反复出现的问题包括这些工具可靠性缺乏可重复性、难以总结这些评估工具的信息、难以将评估转化为治疗方案、行为问题功能存在强烈个体差异，以及最后，这些工具之间和其他评估方法之间的同时效度问题。
