Momoi Y, McCabe J F
Dental School, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, UK.
Dent Mater. 1993 May;9(3):151-4. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(93)90112-4.
Fluoride release from four light-activated glass ionomer cements, including newly developed restorative cements, was evaluated and compared with four conventional acid-base glass ionomer cements. There was no significant difference between the group of light-activated cements and the group of conventional cements, and light-activated cements were found to have a potential for releasing fluoride equivalent to that of conventional cements. The amount and rate of release varied among cements. It may be affected not only by the formation of complex fluoride compounds and their interaction with polyacrylic acid but also by the type and amount of resin used for the photochemical polymerization reaction.
对包括新开发的修复性粘固剂在内的四种光固化玻璃离子水门汀的氟释放情况进行了评估，并与四种传统酸碱玻璃离子水门汀进行了比较。光固化水门汀组和传统水门汀组之间没有显著差异，并且发现光固化水门汀释放氟的潜力与传统水门汀相当。不同水门汀的释放量和释放速率各不相同。这可能不仅受复合氟化物的形成及其与聚丙烯酸的相互作用影响，还受用于光化学聚合反应的树脂类型和用量影响。
