Fowler C A
Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut 06511.
Percept Psychophys. 1994 Jun;55(6):597-610. doi: 10.3758/bf03211675.
This experiment explored the information for place of articulation provided by locus equations--equations for a line relating the second formant (F2) of a vowel at midpoint of F2 of the formant at consonant-vowel (CV) syllable onset. Locus equations cue place indirectly by quantifying directly the degree of coarticulatory overlap (coarticulation resistance) between consonant and vowel. Coarticulation resistance is correlated with place. The experiment tested predictions that when coarticulation resistance varies due to properties of the consonant other than place of articulation (in particular, due to manner of articulation), locus equations would not accurately reflect consonantal place of articulation. These predictions were confirmed. In addition, discriminant analyses, using locus equation variables as classifiers, were generally unsuccessful in classifying a set of consonants representing six different places of articulation. I conclude that locus equations are unlikely to provide useful place information to listeners.
本实验探究了轨迹方程所提供的关于发音部位的信息——轨迹方程描述的是一条直线,该直线表示在辅音-元音(CV)音节起始处,元音的第二共振峰(F2)中点处的F2与辅音的共振峰之间的关系。轨迹方程通过直接量化辅音和元音之间协同发音重叠的程度(协同发音阻力)来间接提示发音部位。协同发音阻力与发音部位相关。该实验检验了以下预测:当协同发音阻力因辅音的发音部位以外的属性(特别是发音方式)而变化时,轨迹方程将无法准确反映辅音的发音部位。这些预测得到了证实。此外,使用轨迹方程变量作为分类器的判别分析,在对一组代表六个不同发音部位的辅音进行分类时,总体上并不成功。我得出结论,轨迹方程不太可能为听众提供有用的发音部位信息。