Burrows R, Hofer H, East M L
Department of Continuing and Adult Education, University of Exeter, Streatham Rise, U.K.
Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Jun 22;256(1347):281-92. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0082.
The effects of ecological factors (prey, competitors, predators and disease) and intervention (immobilization, radio-collaring, and vaccination) on population size and demography were investigated in Serengeti wild dogs (Lycaon pictus), an endangered canid, between 1965 and 1991. Variation in ecological factors explained most changes in demography, but did not explain a decline in adult longevity. A significant reduction in pack life and individual longevity was coincident with the introduction of routine intervention and consistent with pathogen-induced mortality. Survival varied significantly between categories of intervention, and between individuals likely to have been exposed to different degrees of social stress before intervention. The loss of all study packs in 1991 contrasted with the persistence of breeding packs outside the study area. The cause of the demise of most study packs is unknown. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that population extinction was unlikely to be the consequence of chance events alone. One explanation compatible with the evidence is an outbreak of viral disease induced by stress, possibly caused by intervention.
1965年至1991年间,在濒危犬科动物塞伦盖蒂野狗(非洲野犬)中,研究了生态因素(猎物、竞争者、捕食者和疾病)以及干预措施(固定、无线电跟踪和疫苗接种)对种群数量和种群统计学的影响。生态因素的变化解释了种群统计学中的大部分变化,但无法解释成年个体寿命的下降。群体生活和个体寿命的显著缩短与常规干预措施的引入同时出现,并且与病原体导致的死亡率相符。不同干预措施类别之间以及干预前可能遭受不同程度社会压力的个体之间,存活率存在显著差异。1991年所有研究群体的消失与研究区域外繁殖群体的持续存在形成对比。大多数研究群体灭绝的原因尚不清楚。蒙特卡洛模拟表明,种群灭绝不太可能仅仅是偶然事件的结果。与证据相符的一种解释是,压力引发了病毒性疾病的爆发,可能是由干预措施导致的。