Nikkilä M, Solakivi T, Lehtimäki T, Koivula T, Laippala P, Aström B
Department of Internal Medicine, Central Hospital of Kanta-Häme, Hämeenlinna, Finland.
Atherosclerosis. 1994 Apr;106(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(94)90120-1.
Postprandial lipoprotein metabolism may play a role in the etiology of premature coronary artery disease (CAD). To determine whether apolipoprotein E (apo E) polymorphism and the size of low density lipoprotein (LDL) influence postprandial lipemia we studied 39 healthy men and 35 men with CAD. Venous blood samples were obtained before an oral fat load and 3, 5 and 7 h thereafter. Total cholesterol and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations did not change in either group during the fat load, but triglycerides increased more markedly in CAD patients compared with controls independently of apo E phenotypes. There was a positive correlation between the size of LDL and the concentration of HDL cholesterol (r = 0.541, P < 0.001); conversely, an inverse correlation was observed between LDL size and the level of fasting triglycerides (r = -0.582; P < 0.001). The patients with CAD had significantly smaller LDL particles (25.89 +/- 0.56 nm) than in controls (26.21 +/- 0.63 nm) (P < 0.05). The increase in triglyceride levels during the fat load was highest in CAD patients with a small size of LDL particles (< 25.5 nm) and lowest in controls with large LDL (> 25.5 nm). Our results suggest that the magnitude of the triglyceride response is a better indicator of CAD risk than the fasting triglyceride concentration. The best model in our logistic regression analysis selected as significant risk factors the change of triglyceride concentration from the baseline at 5 h after a fat meal and HDL cholesterol. This model classified 83% of the subjects correctly.
餐后脂蛋白代谢可能在早发性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的病因中起作用。为了确定载脂蛋白E(apo E)多态性和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)大小是否影响餐后血脂,我们研究了39名健康男性和35名CAD男性患者。在口服脂肪负荷前及之后3、5和7小时采集静脉血样本。在脂肪负荷期间,两组的总胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇浓度均未改变,但与对照组相比,CAD患者的甘油三酯升高更为明显,且与apo E表型无关。LDL大小与HDL胆固醇浓度呈正相关(r = 0.541,P < 0.001);相反,LDL大小与空腹甘油三酯水平呈负相关(r = -0.582;P < 0.001)。CAD患者的LDL颗粒(25.89 +/- 0.56 nm)明显小于对照组(26.21 +/- 0.63 nm)(P < 0.05)。脂肪负荷期间,LDL颗粒小(< 25.5 nm)的CAD患者甘油三酯水平升高最高,而LDL大(> 25.5 nm)的对照组患者甘油三酯水平升高最低。我们的结果表明,甘油三酯反应的幅度比空腹甘油三酯浓度更能准确反映CAD风险。我们的逻辑回归分析中最佳模型选择脂肪餐后5小时甘油三酯浓度相对于基线的变化和HDL胆固醇作为显著风险因素。该模型正确分类了83%的受试者。