Suppr超能文献

便秘:机构养老老年人群的评估与管理

Constipation: assessment and management in an institutionalized elderly population.

作者信息

Harari D, Gurwitz J H, Avorn J, Choodnovskiy I, Minaker K L

机构信息

Division on Aging, Harvard Medical School.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Sep;42(9):947-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06585.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine prescribing and utilization patterns of laxatives, stool softeners, and enemas in a large, long-term care facility, to compare self-reports of constipation with specific, bowel-related symptoms in residents of this facility, and to examine concordance between bowel symptoms reported by residents and the assessments of the nursing staff.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING AND SUBJECTS

All individuals residing in an academically oriented long-term care facility in the United States for at least 1 month (n = 694).

MEASUREMENTS

Clinical, functional, and medication data were abstracted from the medical and nursing records. Individual interviews regarding bowel-related symptoms were conducted with all able participants (n = 456 (66%)) and their respective primary nurses, and concordance was determined. The study definition of symptom-specific constipation was no more than 2 bowel movements per week and/or straining on more than 1 in 4 bowel movements.

RESULTS

Fifty percent (n = 367) of all residents used at least 1 daily laxative, stool softener or enema during a 1-month study period. Over half of all laxative users (n = 200) took more than 60 doses per month. Stool softeners were most commonly prescribed, followed by saline laxatives, stimulant laxatives, hyperosmolar laxatives, and bulk laxatives. Forty-seven percent (n = 213) of the 456 interview responders reported constipation ("self-reporters"), but only 62% of self-reporters met the study criteria for symptom-specific constipation. Concordance between resident's and nurse's report regarding specific bowel symptoms was only fair to slight (kappa 0.12-0.38). Self-reporters of constipation took almost twice as many laxatives, stool softeners, and enemas as residents who did not report constipation.

摘要

目的

研究一家大型长期护理机构中泻药、大便软化剂和灌肠剂的处方及使用模式,比较该机构居民便秘的自我报告与特定肠道相关症状,以及居民报告的肠道症状与护理人员评估之间的一致性。

设计

横断面研究。

地点和研究对象

所有在美国一家以学术为导向的长期护理机构居住至少1个月的个体(n = 694)。

测量

从医疗和护理记录中提取临床、功能和用药数据。对所有能够参与的参与者(n = 456(66%))及其各自的主管护士进行了关于肠道相关症状的个人访谈,并确定了一致性。症状特异性便秘的研究定义为每周排便不超过2次和/或每4次排便中有超过1次排便时用力。

结果

在为期1个月的研究期间,所有居民中有50%(n = 367)每天至少使用1种泻药、大便软化剂或灌肠剂。所有泻药使用者中有一半以上(n = 200)每月服用超过60剂。大便软化剂是最常用的处方药物,其次是盐类泻药、刺激性泻药、高渗性泻药和容积性泻药。456名接受访谈的受访者中有47%(n = 213)报告便秘(“自我报告者”),但只有62%的自我报告者符合症状特异性便秘的研究标准。居民和护士关于特定肠道症状的报告之间的一致性仅为一般到轻微(kappa值为0.12 - 0.38)。便秘的自我报告者服用的泻药、大便软化剂和灌肠剂几乎是未报告便秘的居民的两倍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验