Kuhlman J E, Bouchardy L, Fishman E K, Zerhouni E A
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md.
Radiographics. 1994 May;14(3):571-95. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.14.3.8066273.
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have complementary roles in the evaluation of chest wall disorders, which include mesenchymal tumors, primary and secondary malignancies, and inflammatory and infectious diseases. Important anatomic regions of the chest wall to evaluate on axial images include the supraclavicular fossa, axilla, and parasternal-internal mammary zone. For diagnosis of a suspected lipoma, CT is faster and less expensive; however, MR imaging may better delineate the extent of more invasive tumors if surgery is planned. MR imaging best depicts intramuscular neurofibromas and soft-tissue, intraspinal, and marrow involvement of neurogenic tumors, although CT more readily shows small calcifications and bone destruction. For diagnosis of lymphangioma, particularly when intravenous contrast material cannot be given for CT, MR imaging is preferred. CT more accurately demonstrates cortical bone destruction from masses arising in the ribs, but MR imaging is better for depicting infiltration of bone marrow and the extent of soft-tissue involvement. MR imaging displays Pancoast tumors and chest wall invasion from lung cancer better than CT because of its multiplanar capability and depiction of subtle differences in soft-tissue contrast. Both CT and MR imaging are helpful in evaluating infections, with CT being used to reveal bone destruction and to guide aspiration and drainage and MR imaging demonstrating soft-tissue involvement. The choice of technique, CT versus MR imaging, often depends on the specific clinical question to be addressed.
计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MR)在评估胸壁疾病中具有互补作用,胸壁疾病包括间叶组织肿瘤、原发性和继发性恶性肿瘤以及炎症性和感染性疾病。在轴位图像上需要评估的胸壁重要解剖区域包括锁骨上窝、腋窝和胸骨旁-乳腺内区域。对于疑似脂肪瘤的诊断,CT检查速度更快且成本更低;然而,如果计划进行手术,MR成像可能能更好地描绘侵袭性更强的肿瘤的范围。MR成像最能清晰显示肌内神经纤维瘤以及神经源性肿瘤的软组织、脊髓内和骨髓受累情况,尽管CT更容易显示小钙化灶和骨质破坏。对于淋巴管瘤的诊断,尤其是在无法进行CT静脉造影时,首选MR成像。CT能更准确地显示肋骨肿物导致的皮质骨破坏,但MR成像在描绘骨髓浸润和软组织受累范围方面更具优势。由于MR成像具有多平面成像能力且能显示软组织对比度的细微差异,所以在显示肺上沟瘤和肺癌对胸壁的侵犯方面比CT更好。CT和MR成像在评估感染方面都有帮助,CT用于显示骨质破坏并指导穿刺和引流,而MR成像则用于显示软组织受累情况。选择CT还是MR成像技术,通常取决于需要解决的具体临床问题。