Langerman L, Bansinath M, Grant G J
Department of Anesthesiology, New York University Medical Center, New York.
Anesth Analg. 1994 Sep;79(3):490-4. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199409000-00015.
Local anesthetic partition coefficients correlate with drug potencies in vitro, but in vivo data have not always complimented in vitro results. Despite extensive studies on intrathecal anesthetic action, whether there is correlation between the partition coefficient and local anesthetic potency has not been addressed. Mice (n = 150) were randomly allocated into 15 groups. Intrathecal injections of etidocaine (E), tetracaine (T), bupivacaine (B), lidocaine (L), or procaine (P) were administered and analgetic effect was measured using tail-flick (TF) test. Concentration-response regressions were constructed for each drug; EC50 values were calculated and compared at 95% confidence intervals. The EC50 values between E (0.017%), T (0.019%), and B (0.012%) were not significantly variant. The EC50 of L (0.098%) and P (0.229%) were significantly different from each other and from E, T, and B. The EC50 values were converted to ED50 in nmols. Relative anesthetic potency, defined as the inverse value of ED50 of drug was 23:16:15:2.4:1 for B, E, T, L, and P, respectively. ED50 showed high correlation (R = 0.978) with partition coefficients of local anesthetics. This study implies that the partition coefficient is a predictor of intrathecal local anesthetic potency. We suggest that the mouse model is reliable for evaluation of intrathecal local anesthetic action.
局部麻醉药的分配系数与体外药物效能相关,但体内数据并不总是与体外结果相符。尽管对鞘内麻醉作用进行了广泛研究,但分配系数与局部麻醉药效能之间是否存在相关性尚未得到探讨。将150只小鼠随机分为15组。鞘内注射依替卡因(E)、丁卡因(T)、布比卡因(B)、利多卡因(L)或普鲁卡因(P),并使用甩尾(TF)试验测量镇痛效果。为每种药物构建浓度-反应回归曲线;计算EC50值并在95%置信区间进行比较。E(0.017%)、T(0.019%)和B(0.012%)之间的EC50值无显著差异。L(0.098%)和P(0.229%)的EC50彼此之间以及与E、T和B均有显著差异。将EC50值换算为纳摩尔的ED50。相对麻醉效能定义为药物ED50的倒数,B、E、T、L和P的相对麻醉效能分别为23:16:15:2.4:1。ED50与局部麻醉药的分配系数显示出高度相关性(R = 0.978)。本研究表明分配系数是鞘内局部麻醉药效能的一个预测指标。我们认为小鼠模型对于评估鞘内局部麻醉作用是可靠的。