• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全科医疗中监测抗凝控制:有和没有医院抗凝服务地区的管理比较

Monitoring anticoagulant control in general practice: comparison of management in areas with and without access to hospital anticoagulant.

作者信息

Pell J P, Alcock J

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Aug;44(385):357-8.

PMID:8068394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1238952/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospital anticoagulant clinics are available only in some areas. There is little information on the contribution of general practitioners to oral anticoagulant monitoring, and whether their management varies with access to hospital clinics.

AIM

A study was undertaken to compare general practice management of anticoagulant therapy in two health boards with contrasting access to hospital clinics.

METHOD

A postal questionnaire was sent to the senior partners in all 198 practices in Lothian and Fife, Scotland.

RESULTS

Lack of access to hospital clinics in Lothian health board resulted in more practices reporting taking sole responsibility for anticoagulant control than in Fife where there was access (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in management policies. Overall, 93% of practices used a protocol for thrombotest target ranges, but 75% had no policy on review frequency and only 2% assessed complication or failure rates. Reduced access to hospital clinics was associated with a decreased likelihood of favouring hospital involvement. Sole responsibility for anticoagulant management was undertaken by 56% of general practices, although only 21% of doctors viewed this as ideal. Most general practitioners felt that they should monitor patients on anticoagulant therapy but should refer to hospital those with problematic control.

CONCLUSION

Access to hospital clinics affected the degree of involvement of general practitioners in oral anticoagulant monitoring, but did not considerably alter their management practice.

摘要

背景

医院抗凝门诊仅在部分地区提供。关于全科医生在口服抗凝剂监测中的作用以及他们的管理是否因能否使用医院门诊而有所不同,相关信息较少。

目的

开展一项研究,比较两个卫生委员会中抗凝治疗的全科管理情况,这两个卫生委员会在使用医院门诊方面存在差异。

方法

向苏格兰洛锡安和法夫郡所有198家诊所的高级合伙人发送了邮政调查问卷。

结果

洛锡安卫生委员会无法使用医院门诊,导致报告承担抗凝控制唯一责任的诊所比可以使用医院门诊的法夫郡更多(P < 0.001)。然而,管理政策没有显著差异。总体而言,93%的诊所使用了血栓试验目标范围的方案,但75%没有关于复查频率的政策,只有2%评估了并发症或失败率。使用医院门诊机会减少与支持医院参与的可能性降低相关。56%的全科诊所承担抗凝管理的唯一责任,尽管只有21%的医生认为这是理想的。大多数全科医生认为他们应该监测接受抗凝治疗的患者,但对于控制有问题的患者应该转诊到医院。

结论

使用医院门诊影响了全科医生参与口服抗凝剂监测的程度,但并没有显著改变他们的管理实践。

相似文献

1
Monitoring anticoagulant control in general practice: comparison of management in areas with and without access to hospital anticoagulant.在全科医疗中监测抗凝控制:有和没有医院抗凝服务地区的管理比较
Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Aug;44(385):357-8.
2
Comparison of anticoagulant control among patients attending general practice and a hospital anticoagulant clinic.普通诊所患者与医院抗凝门诊患者抗凝控制情况的比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Apr;43(369):152-4.
3
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
4
Differences between general practices in hospital admission rates for self-inflicted injury and self-poisoning: influence of socioeconomic factors.自残和自我中毒住院率的一般医疗实践差异:社会经济因素的影响
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Sep;45(398):458-62.
5
Effect of general practitioner hospitals on district general hospital bed use in the Highlands of Scotland.苏格兰高地全科医生医院对地区综合医院床位使用情况的影响。
Health Bull (Edinb). 2000 Sep;58(5):385-9.
6
Access to complementary medicine via general practice.通过全科医疗获得补充医学服务。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jan;51(462):25-30.
7
Setting up a Paediatric Rapid Access Outpatient Unit: views of general practice teams.设立儿科快速门诊:全科医疗团队的观点
BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Sep 29;9:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-9-54.
8
What happens to patients following open access gastroscopy? An outcome study from general practice.接受开放式胃镜检查的患者会怎样?一项来自全科医疗的结果研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Nov;44(388):519-21.
9
Investigation of benefits and costs of an ophthalmic outreach clinic in general practice.综合医疗中眼科外展诊所的效益与成本调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Dec;45(401):649-52.
10
General practitioners and psychiatrists: comparison of attitudes to depression using the depression attitude questionnaire.全科医生和精神科医生:使用抑郁态度问卷比较对抑郁症的态度
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Feb;45(391):89-92.

引用本文的文献

1
Legal and professional implications of shared care: a case study in oral anticoagulation stroke prevention therapy.共享护理的法律和专业影响:口服抗凝剂预防中风治疗的案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Mar 10;15:93. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0756-9.
2
[Characteristics of oral anti-coagulation treatment in high-risk chronic auricular fibrillation].[高危慢性心房颤动患者口服抗凝治疗的特点]
Aten Primaria. 2004 Nov 15;34(8):414-9. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(04)78925-8.
3
[Level of understanding of patients on anticoagulants at a health centre: relationship of this and monitoring of therapy].[健康中心患者对抗凝剂的理解程度:其与治疗监测的关系]
Aten Primaria. 2003 Jun 30;32(2):101-5. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)70744-6.
4
Recommendations for patients undertaking self management of oral anticoagulation.口服抗凝剂自我管理患者的建议。
BMJ. 2001 Oct 27;323(7319):985-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7319.985.
5
Does the Birmingham model of oral anticoagulation management in primary care work outside trial conditions?初级保健中伯明翰口服抗凝管理模式在试验条件之外是否有效?
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Oct;51(471):828-9.
6
Where should oral anticoagulation monitoring take place?口服抗凝治疗监测应在哪里进行?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Aug;47(421):479-80.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of anticoagulant control among patients attending general practice and a hospital anticoagulant clinic.普通诊所患者与医院抗凝门诊患者抗凝控制情况的比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Apr;43(369):152-4.
2
Anticoagulants for heart disease.用于心脏病的抗凝血剂。
Br J Hosp Med. 1980 Jun;23(6):606, 609-10, 612 passim.
3
Therapeutic control of anticoagulant treatment.抗凝治疗的治疗性控制
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Mar 6;284(6317):702-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6317.702.
4
Long-term oral anticoagulant therapy in elderly patients.老年患者的长期口服抗凝治疗
Age Ageing. 1988 Nov;17(6):388-96. doi: 10.1093/ageing/17.6.388.
5
Computer control of anticoagulant dose for therapeutic management.用于治疗管理的抗凝剂剂量的计算机控制。
BMJ. 1989 Nov 11;299(6709):1207-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6709.1207.
6
Arterial embolism in thyrotoxicosis with atrial fibrillation.甲状腺毒症合并心房颤动时的动脉栓塞
Br Med J. 1977 Sep 10;2(6088):688-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6088.688.
7
Current status of antithrombotic therapy in cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病抗栓治疗的现状
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1976 Nov-Dec;19(3):235-53. doi: 10.1016/0033-0620(76)90017-7.