• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluation of a semi-automated 24-hour commercial system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative bacteria.

作者信息

Monnet D, Lafay D, Desmonceaux M, Boeufgras J M, Allard F, Freney J

机构信息

Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Nord, France.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 May;13(5):424-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01972003.

DOI:10.1007/BF01972003
PMID:8070459
Abstract

A semi-automated commercial system (ID 32 E, bioMérieux) for 24-hour identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative fermentative and nonfermentative bacteria encountered in diagnostic microbiology was evaluated. Overall, the system correctly identified 506 (91.5%) of the 553 strains tested, 94 (17.0%) strains requiring additional tests for complete identification. Six (1.1%) strains were misidentified and 33 (6.0%) strains were not identified. Eight (1.4%) strains were not present in the database and were misidentified or not identified. The system is a suitable alternative to existing systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative bacteria frequently encountered in clinical samples.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a semi-automated 24-hour commercial system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative bacteria.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 May;13(5):424-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01972003.
2
Direct comparison of the BD phoenix system with the MicroScan WalkAway system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative organisms.BD phoenix系统与MicroScan WalkAway系统用于肠杆菌科细菌和非发酵革兰阴性菌鉴定及药敏试验的直接比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jul;46(7):2327-33. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00075-08. Epub 2008 May 21.
3
Evaluation of a new commercial system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative bacteria.一种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌和非发酵菌的新型商业系统的评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jul;11(7):610-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01961667.
4
Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.评估Phoenix 100 ID/AST系统和NID鉴定板对肠杆菌科、弧菌科以及常见分离出的非肠道革兰氏阴性杆菌的鉴定能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Mar;44(3):928-33. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.928-933.2006.
5
Evaluation of an automated system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenting bacilli.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌和非发酵菌的自动化系统的评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999 Dec;18(12):902-7. doi: 10.1007/s100960050429.
6
Two-center collaborative evaluation of performance of the BD phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacteria.BD phoenix自动化微生物系统对革兰氏阴性菌进行鉴定和药敏试验性能的双中心协作评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Nov;44(11):4085-94. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00614-06. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
7
Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of medically relevant gram-negative rods.评估VITEK 2系统对医学相关革兰氏阴性杆菌的快速鉴定能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jul;36(7):1948-52. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.1948-1952.1998.
8
Evaluation of the Vitek 2 ID-GNB assay for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other nonenteric gram-negative bacilli and comparison with the Vitek GNI+ card.评估Vitek 2 ID-GNB检测法对肠杆菌科细菌及其他非肠道革兰氏阴性杆菌的鉴定能力，并与Vitek GNI+卡进行比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 May;41(5):2096-101. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.5.2096-2101.2003.
9
Evaluation of RapID onE system for identification of 379 strains in the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-negative, gram-negative nonfermenters.评估RapID onE系统对肠杆菌科379株菌株以及氧化酶阴性革兰氏阴性非发酵菌的鉴定能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Apr;32(4):931-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.931-934.1994.
10
Evaluation of two BBL Crystal systems for identification of some clinically important gram-negative bacteria.评估两种BBL Crystal系统用于鉴定某些临床重要革兰氏阴性菌的效果。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2221-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2221-2224.1994.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of Vitek 2 nonfermenting gram-negative cards and Vitek 2 version 4.02 software for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of nonfermenting gram-negative rods from patients with cystic fibrosis.验证 Vitek 2 非发酵革兰阴性菌鉴定卡和 Vitek 2 4.02 软件对囊性纤维化患者来源的非发酵革兰阴性杆菌的鉴定和药敏试验结果。
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Oct;47(10):3283-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00505-09. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
2
Particular biochemical profiles for enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates on the ID 32E system.肠出血性大肠杆菌O157:H7菌株在ID 32E系统上的特定生化谱。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Mar;39(3):1161-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.1161-1164.2001.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Auto-Microbic system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.用于快速鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的自动微生物系统的临床实验室评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Mar;13(3):491-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.491-497.1981.
2
Comparison of automated and rapid manual methods for the same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.用于肠杆菌科细菌同日鉴定的自动化方法与快速手工方法的比较
Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Jun;79(6):683-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/79.6.683.
3
Carbon substrate assimilation patterns of clinical and environmental strains of Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas sobria and Aeromonas caviae observed with a micromethod.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1988 Nov;269(3):323-30. doi: 10.1016/s0176-6724(88)80175-5.
4
[Identification of the principal species of the genus Serratia by a simplified system].[通过简化系统鉴定沙雷氏菌属的主要菌种]
Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol. 1988 May-Jun;139(3):337-49. doi: 10.1016/0769-2609(88)90026-9.
5
Description and evaluation of the semiautomated 4-hour ATB 32E method for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌成员的半自动4小时ATB 32E方法的描述与评价
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jan;29(1):138-41. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.138-141.1991.
6
Preliminary evaluation of Biolog, a carbon source utilization method for bacterial identification.Biolog（一种用于细菌鉴定的碳源利用方法）的初步评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jun;29(6):1143-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.6.1143-1147.1991.
7
Difficulties in identifying Klebsiella strains of clinical origin.
Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1991 Jan;274(4):456-64. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80081-2.
8
Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.API 20E鉴定系统与传统生化方法用于肠杆菌科细菌鉴定的重新评估：对一种旧产品的新审视。
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):123-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.123-125.1992.
9
Evaluation of a new commercial system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative bacteria.一种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌和非发酵菌的新型商业系统的评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jul;11(7):610-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01961667.