Suppr超能文献

评估RapID onE系统对肠杆菌科379株菌株以及氧化酶阴性革兰氏阴性非发酵菌的鉴定能力。

Evaluation of RapID onE system for identification of 379 strains in the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-negative, gram-negative nonfermenters.

作者信息

Kitch T T, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C

机构信息

Department of Pathology (Clinical Microbiology), Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Apr;32(4):931-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.931-934.1994.

Abstract

The ability of the RapID onE system (Innovative Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Norcross, Ga.) to identify 364 strains in the family Enterobacteriaceae and 15 oxidase-negative, gram-negative, nonfermentative rods was evaluated. Kits were inoculated with no. 2 McFarland standard suspensions, and reactions were interpreted after 4 h of incubation at 35 degrees C. Overall, the method correctly identified (to the species level or to the genus level for salmonellas and non-Shigella sonnei Shigella species) 363 strains (95.8%) without additional tests. For four strains (1.0%), additional tests were required to delineate the correct identification from a range of two or more possibilities; these included one Serratia liquefaciens (Serratia marcescens or Serratia liquefaciens), one Serratia rubidaea (Serratia rubidaea or Serratia odorifera), one Salmonella typhi (Leminorella richardii or Salmonella sp.) and one Yersinia enterocolitica (Yersinia frederiksenii, Yersinia intermedia, or Yersinia enterocolitica). Twelve strains (3.2%) were misidentified or yielded codes with no identification; these comprised one Citrobacter amalonaticus (no identification), three Enterobacter hormaechei (not in the RapID onE database; two Enterobacter amnigenus, one Enterobacter sp.), one Serratia liquefaciens (Enterobacter cloacae), one Serratia rubidaea (no identification), four Serratia fonticola (not in RapID onE database; two Enterobacter aerogenes, one Serratia marcescens, one not identified), one Proteus mirabilis (Proteus penneri), and one Proteus vulgaris (Providencia rustigianii). If the seven strains not included in the database had been excluded, correct identification rates would have risen to 97.6% without additional tests and 98.7% with additional tests, with misidentification rates dropping to 1.3%. The RapID onE system is easy to set up and the results are easy to read, and the system provides an accurate, nonautomated commercially available method for the same-day identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-negative, gram-negative nonfermenters.

摘要

对RapID onE系统(创新诊断系统公司,佐治亚州诺克罗斯)鉴定肠杆菌科364株菌株以及15株氧化酶阴性、革兰氏阴性、非发酵杆菌的能力进行了评估。用2号麦氏标准悬液接种试剂盒,在35℃孵育4小时后解读反应结果。总体而言,该方法无需额外检测就能正确鉴定(至种水平或对于沙门氏菌以及非宋内志贺氏菌的志贺氏菌种至属水平)363株菌株(95.8%)。对于4株菌株(1.0%),需要额外检测以从两种或更多可能性中确定正确鉴定结果;这些菌株包括1株液化沙雷氏菌(黏质沙雷氏菌或液化沙雷氏菌)、1株深红沙雷氏菌(深红沙雷氏菌或气味沙雷氏菌)、1株伤寒沙门氏菌(里氏勒米诺菌或沙门氏菌属)以及1株小肠结肠炎耶尔森氏菌(费氏耶尔森氏菌、中间耶尔森氏菌或小肠结肠炎耶尔森氏菌)。12株菌株(3.2%)被错误鉴定或产生无法鉴定的编码;这些菌株包括1株无丙二酸柠檬酸杆菌(无法鉴定)、3株霍氏肠杆菌(不在RapID onE数据库中;2株产气肠杆菌、1株阴沟肠杆菌)、1株液化沙雷氏菌(阴沟肠杆菌)、1株深红沙雷氏菌(无法鉴定)、4株丰蒂科拉沙雷氏菌(不在RapID onE数据库中;2株产气肠杆菌、1株黏质沙雷氏菌、1株未鉴定)、1株奇异变形杆菌(彭氏变形杆菌)以及1株普通变形杆菌(鲁氏普罗威登斯菌)。如果排除数据库中未包含的7株菌株,无需额外检测时正确鉴定率将升至97.6%,进行额外检测时升至98.7%,错误鉴定率降至1.3%。RapID onE系统易于设置且结果易于解读,该系统为肠杆菌科成员以及氧化酶阴性、革兰氏阴性非发酵菌的当日鉴定提供了一种准确的、非自动化的商业可用方法。

相似文献

8
Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;1(2):76-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02014195.

引用本文的文献

2
Citrobacter amalonaticus human urinary tract infections, Marseille, France.无丙二酸柠檬酸杆菌致人类尿路感染,法国马赛
New Microbes New Infect. 2016 Jan 21;11:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2016.01.003. eCollection 2016 May.

本文引用的文献

4
Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;1(2):76-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02014195.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验