用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌成员的半自动4小时ATB 32E方法的描述与评价
Description and evaluation of the semiautomated 4-hour ATB 32E method for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
作者信息
Freney J, Herve C, Desmonceaux M, Allard F, Boeufgras J M, Monget D, Fleurette J
机构信息
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Faculté de Pharmacie, Lyon, France.
出版信息
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jan;29(1):138-41. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.138-141.1991.
Abstract
A study was performed to compare the rapid identification system ATB 32E (API-bioMérieux SA, La Balme-les-Grottes, France) with conventional biochemical methods for identifying 414 isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae and the genus Aeromonas, mainly of clinical origin. Overall, 395 strains (95.4%) were correctly identified, with 48 (11.6%) requiring extra tests for complete identification. Ten strains (2.4%) were not identified, and nine (2.9%) were misidentified. The ATB 32E is a suitable alternative for rapid identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
摘要
开展了一项研究，以比较快速鉴定系统ATB 32E（法国拉巴尔姆莱格罗特市生物梅里埃公司）与传统生化方法，用于鉴定414株肠杆菌科和气单胞菌属菌株，这些菌株主要来源于临床。总体而言，395株菌株（95.4%）被正确鉴定，48株（11.6%）需要额外检测以完成鉴定。10株菌株（2.4%）未被鉴定出来，9株（2.9%）被错误鉴定。ATB 32E是快速鉴定肠杆菌科成员的合适替代方法。
相似文献
1
Description and evaluation of the semiautomated 4-hour ATB 32E method for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌成员的半自动4小时ATB 32E方法的描述与评价
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jan;29(1):138-41. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.138-141.1991.
2
Description and evaluation of the semiautomated 4-hour rapid ID 32 Strep method for identification of streptococci and members of related genera.用于鉴定链球菌及相关属成员的半自动4小时快速ID 32 Strep方法的描述与评价
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Oct;30(10):2657-61. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2657-2661.1992.
3
Biochemical profiles and serotypes of nosocomial Enterobacter cloacae strains in Northern Norway: biochemical identification problems with commercial test systems.挪威北部医院内阴沟肠杆菌菌株的生化特征及血清型：商用检测系统的生化鉴定问题
Infection. 1995 Nov-Dec;23(6):339-43. doi: 10.1007/BF01713562.
4
Accuracy and reproducibility of the 4-hour ATB 32A method for anaerobe identification.用于厌氧菌鉴定的4小时ATB 32A方法的准确性和可重复性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Nov;27(11):2509-13. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.11.2509-2513.1989.
5
Evaluation of API Coryne in comparison with conventional methods for identifying coryneform bacteria.与传统方法相比，对API棒状杆菌鉴定系统进行评价以鉴定棒状杆菌属细菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jan;29(1):38-41. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.38-41.1991.
6
Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.API 20E鉴定系统与传统生化方法用于肠杆菌科细菌鉴定的重新评估：对一种旧产品的新审视。
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):123-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.123-125.1992.
7
Enterosistem 18-R: description and comparative evaluation with conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.肠道系统18-R：与用于鉴定肠杆菌科成员的传统方法的描述及比较评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Oct;29(10):2300-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2300-2304.1991.
8
Evaluation of a semi-automated 24-hour commercial system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative bacteria.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 May;13(5):424-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01972003.
9
Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科常规临床分离株的API快速E四小时系统与API 20E过夜系统的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Apr;21(4):542-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.4.542-545.1985.
10
Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.对API 20E、Vitek GNI、MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID和Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF用于鉴定肠杆菌科成员及常见革兰氏阴性、非葡萄糖发酵杆菌的准确性进行平行比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Dec;31(12):3165-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3165-3169.1993.
引用本文的文献
1
Two-center collaborative evaluation of performance of the BD phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacteria.BD phoenix自动化微生物系统对革兰氏阴性菌进行鉴定和药敏试验性能的双中心协作评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Nov;44(11):4085-94. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00614-06. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
2
Comparison of systems for identification and differentiation of species within the genus Yersinia.耶尔森氏菌属内物种鉴定和区分系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Nov;36(11):3366-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.11.3366-3368.1998.
3
Comparison of Vitek and Cobas Micro systems with a semiautomated conventional microsystem for identification and susceptibility testing of gram negative bacilli.Vitek和Cobas微生物系统与半自动传统微生物系统用于革兰氏阴性杆菌鉴定和药敏试验的比较。
J Clin Pathol. 1994 Jan;47(1):71-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.1.71.
4
Evaluation of a semi-automated 24-hour commercial system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative bacteria.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 May;13(5):424-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01972003.
5
Evaluation of RapID onE system for identification of 379 strains in the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-negative, gram-negative nonfermenters.评估RapID onE系统对肠杆菌科379株菌株以及氧化酶阴性革兰氏阴性非发酵菌的鉴定能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Apr;32(4):931-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.931-934.1994.
6
Evaluation of a new commercial system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative bacteria.一种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌和非发酵菌的新型商业系统的评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jul;11(7):610-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01961667.
本文引用的文献
1
Atypical biogroups of Escherichia coli found in clinical specimens and description of Escherichia hermannii sp. nov.临床标本中发现的非典型大肠杆菌生物群及赫尔曼埃希氏菌新种的描述
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):703-13. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.703-713.1982.
2
Biotyping of Aeromonas isolates as a correlate to delineating a species-associated disease spectrum.气单胞菌分离株的生物分型与描绘物种相关疾病谱的相关性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jan;19(1):44-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.1.44-47.1984.
3
Biochemical identification of new species and biogroups of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical specimens.从临床标本中分离出的肠杆菌科新物种和生物群的生化鉴定。
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jan;21(1):46-76. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.1.46-76.1985.
Zotero 插件