Le Davay M, Victor J, Dupuis J M, Merheb M, Tran P, Tadeï A
Service de Cardiologie, CHU Angers.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1994 May;43(5):253-5.
The diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia is difficult, often requiring endocavitary investigation to obtain proof. Many authors have attempted to define criteria used to distinguish between ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia with wide QRS in the surface electrocardiogram. These criteria have been determined in patients not taking antiarrhythmic drugs. The authors report the case of a patient treated with flecainide for atrial fibrillation and hospitalised because of faints and tachycardia with wide complexes. The diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia was justified by surface electrocardiogram but was eliminated by subsequent endocavitary electrophysiological studies. The use of anti-arrhythmic drugs thus limits the applicability of electrocardiographic criteria in cases of tachycardia with wide QRS.
室性心动过速的诊断较为困难,常常需要进行心腔内检查来获取证据。许多作者试图确定用于区分室性心动过速和体表心电图中伴有宽QRS波的室上性心动过速的标准。这些标准是在未服用抗心律失常药物的患者中确定的。作者报告了1例因房颤接受氟卡尼治疗的患者,该患者因晕厥和伴有宽QRS波的心动过速而住院。体表心电图显示该患者符合室性心动过速的诊断,但随后的心腔内电生理研究排除了这一诊断。因此,抗心律失常药物的使用限制了心电图标准在伴有宽QRS波心动过速病例中的适用性。