Fuller D D, Davis T E, Kibsey P C, Rosmus L, Ayers L W, Ott M, Saubolle M A, Sewell D L
Department of Pathology, Wishard Memorial Hospital, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jun;32(6):1488-91. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.6.1488-1491.1994.
We compared the BACTEC Plus 26/27 culture system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems, Sparks, Md.) with and without fastidious organism supplement with conventional centrifugation preparation and plating for the recovery and speed of detection of microorganisms. A total of 1,101 sterile body fluid specimens were collected and processed at five hospital laboratories, yielding 234 (21%) positive cultures. Of the 176 isolates considered clinically significant, 133 (76%) were recovered by both the BACTEC system and conventional culture, while 28 (16% [P < 0.005]) were recovered by BACTEC only and 11 (6%) were recovered by conventional culture alone. There were no statistically significant differences in the speed of detection of microbial growth. It was found that BACTEC, with or without the addition of fastidious organism supplement, exhibited improved sensitivity for the recovery of microorganisms, including fastidious bacteria.
我们将添加和未添加苛养菌补充剂的BACTEC Plus 26/27培养系统(美国马里兰州斯帕克斯市贝克顿·迪金森诊断仪器系统公司)与传统的离心制备和接种方法进行了比较,以评估微生物的回收率和检测速度。在五家医院实验室共收集并处理了1101份无菌体液标本,其中234份(21%)培养结果呈阳性。在176株被认为具有临床意义的分离菌株中,133株(76%)可通过BACTEC系统和传统培养方法同时检出,28株(16%[P<0.005])仅通过BACTEC系统检出,11株(6%)仅通过传统培养方法检出。微生物生长的检测速度在统计学上没有显著差异。结果发现,无论是否添加苛养菌补充剂,BACTEC系统在微生物(包括苛养菌)的回收方面均表现出更高的灵敏度。