Bourbeau P, Riley J, Heiter B J, Master R, Young C, Pierson C
Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Nov;36(11):3273-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.11.3273-3277.1998.
Studies have demonstrated that large-volume culture methods for sterile body fluids other than blood increase recovery compared to traditional plated-medium methods. BacT/Alert is a fully automated blood culture system for detecting bacteremia and fungemia. In this study, we compared culture in BacT/Alert standard aerobic and anaerobic bottles, BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and FAN anaerobic bottles, and culture on routine media for six specimen types, i.e., continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysate (CAPD), peritoneal, amniotic, pericardial, synovial, and pleural fluids. Specimen volumes were divided equally among the three arms of the study. A total of 1,157 specimens were tested, with 227 significant isolates recovered from 193 specimens. Recovery by method was as follows: standard bottles, 186 of 227 (82%); FAN bottles, 217 of 227 (96%); and routine culture, 184 of 227 (81%). The FAN bottles recovered significantly more gram-positive cocci (P < 0.001), Staphylococcus aureus (P = 0.003), coagulase-negative staphylococci (P = 0.008), gram-negative bacilli (P < 0.001), Enterobacteriaceae (P = 0.005), and total organisms (P < 0.001) than the routine culture. There were no significant differences in recovery between the standard bottles and the routine culture. The FAN aerobic bottle recovered significantly more gram-positive cocci (P < 0.001), S. aureus isolates (P < 0.001), coagulase-negative staphyococci (P = 0.003), and total organisms (P < 0.001) than the standard aerobic bottle, while the FAN anaerobic bottle recovered significantly more gram-positive cocci (P < 0.001), S. aureus isolates (P < 0.001), Enterobacteriaceae (P = 0.03), and total organisms (P < 0.001) than the standard anaerobic bottle. For specific specimen types, significantly more isolates were recovered from the FAN bottles compared to the routine culture for synovial (P < 0.001) and CAPD (P = 0.004) fluids. Overall, the FAN bottles were superior in performance to both the standard bottles and the routine culture for detection of microorganisms from the types of sterile body fluids included in this study.
研究表明,与传统的平板培养基方法相比,用于血液以外无菌体液的大容量培养方法可提高回收率。BacT/Alert是一种用于检测菌血症和真菌血症的全自动血培养系统。在本研究中,我们比较了在BacT/Alert标准需氧瓶和厌氧瓶、BacT/Alert FAN需氧瓶和FAN厌氧瓶中的培养情况,以及六种标本类型(即持续性非卧床腹膜透析液(CAPD)、腹膜液、羊水、心包液、滑膜液和胸水)在常规培养基上的培养情况。标本体积在研究的三个组中平均分配。共检测了1157份标本,从193份标本中分离出227株有意义的菌株。各方法的回收率如下:标准瓶,227株中的186株(82%);FAN瓶,227株中的217株(96%);常规培养,227株中的184株(8)%。与常规培养相比,FAN瓶回收的革兰氏阳性球菌(P<0.001)、金黄色葡萄球菌(P=0.003)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(P=0.008)、革兰氏阴性杆菌(P<0.001)、肠杆菌科(P=0.005)和总菌株数(P<0.001)明显更多。标准瓶与常规培养在回收率上无显著差异。FAN需氧瓶回收的革兰氏阳性球菌(P<0.001)、金黄色葡萄球菌分离株(P<0.001)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(P=0.003)和总菌株数(P<0.001)明显多于标准需氧瓶,而FAN厌氧瓶回收的革兰氏阳性球菌(P<0.001)、金黄色葡萄球菌分离株(P<0.001)、肠杆菌科(P=0.03)和总菌株数(P<0.001)明显多于标准厌氧瓶。对于特定的标本类型,与常规培养相比,FAN瓶从滑膜液(P<0.001)和CAPD液(P=0.004)中回收的分离株明显更多。总体而言,在检测本研究中所包括的无菌体液类型中的微生物方面,FAN瓶在性能上优于标准瓶和常规培养。