• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[灾难预案的形式与可读性]

[Form and readability of disaster plans].

作者信息

Arvesen A, Johansen T E

机构信息

Kirurgisk avdeling Telemark sentralsjukehus, Oslo.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1994 Jun 20;114(16):1820-2.

PMID:8079297
Abstract

We have evaluated the disaster contingency plans for 62 out of 69 Norwegian hospitals with surgical, acute emergency functions. Page volume varied from 2-115, mean 33 pages. Only nine hospitals had pocket size printed documents (A5). At the rest of the hospitals the plans had an A4-format and consisted of photocopied pages. Illustrations were few and of low quality. Too much text contained general information with no practical relevant instruction. Readability varied for different groups of health workers. Doctors received the best instructions for their tasks. Hospitals should seek professional assistance to edit, illustrate and produce the plans, and a certain degree of standardization of the plans should be aimed at. National health authorities should encourage the hospitals in this work.

摘要

我们已经评估了挪威69家具备外科手术及急性急诊功能的医院中的62家的灾难应急预案。页数从2页到115页不等,平均为33页。只有9家医院有口袋大小(A5)的印刷文件。在其他医院,预案采用A4格式,由复印件组成。插图很少且质量不高。过多的文本包含一般性信息,没有实际相关的指导内容。不同医护人员群体的可读性各不相同。医生在其任务方面得到了最好的指导。医院应寻求专业帮助来编辑、绘制插图并制作预案,并且应致力于一定程度的预案标准化。国家卫生当局应鼓励医院开展这项工作。

相似文献

1
[Form and readability of disaster plans].[灾难预案的形式与可读性]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1994 Jun 20;114(16):1820-2.
2
[Contents and updating of disaster plans].[灾难预案的内容与更新]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1994 Jun 20;114(16):1815-9.
3
Development of a statewide hospital plan for radiologic emergencies.制定全州范围的放射紧急情况医院计划。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 May 1;65(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.047.
4
Ready, aye ready? Support mechanisms for healthcare workers in emergency planning: a critical gap analysis of three hospital emergency plans.准备好了吗,确实准备好了?应急规划中医护人员的支持机制:对三份医院应急计划的关键差距分析。
Am J Disaster Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;2(4):195-210.
5
Greater New York Hospital Association offers more insight on emergency management.
Jt Comm Perspect. 2003 Apr;23(4):9-11.
6
Assessment of the reliability of the Johns Hopkins/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality hospital disaster drill evaluation tool.约翰霍普金斯大学/医疗保健研究与质量机构医院灾难演练评估工具的可靠性评估
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;52(3):204-10, 210.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.07.025. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
7
Emergency response planning in hospitals, United States: 2003-2004.美国医院的应急响应规划:2003 - 2004年
Adv Data. 2007 Aug 20(391):1-13.
8
[Disaster planning in Danish hospitals].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Sep 17;152(38):2709-11.
9
Bioterrorism and mass casualty preparedness in hospitals: United States, 2003.2003年美国医院的生物恐怖主义与大规模伤亡应急准备
Adv Data. 2005 Sep 27(364):1-14.
10
Special report. Recent natural and man-made disasters: testing hospital disaster plans and security departments in real-life situations.特别报道。近期的自然和人为灾害:在实际情况中检验医院灾难预案和安全部门。
Hosp Secur Saf Manage. 1995 Dec;16(8):5-8.