Katsouyanni K, Trichopoulou A, Stuver S, Garas Y, Kritselis A, Kyriakou G, Stoïkidou M, Boyle P, Trichopoulos D
Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Athens Medical School, Greece.
Br J Cancer. 1994 Sep;70(3):537-41. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.341.
The Greek diet is characterized by a high total fat but low saturated fat intake. In a hospital-based case-control study of female breast cancer conducted in Athens (1989-91), 820 patients with confirmed cancer of the breast were compared with 795 orthopaedic patient controls and 753 hospital visitor controls, matched to the cases by age and interviewer. Diet was ascertained through a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire; macronutrient intakes were estimated from the nutrient content of a selected typical portion size for each specified food item, summed for all items. Logistic regression was used to analyse the data, controlling for demographic and reproductive risk factors for breast cancer as well as for total energy intake and mutual confounding influences among nutrients. There was no significant or suggestive association of total protein, total fat, categories of fat or total carbohydrates with breast cancer risk. Thus, the mutually adjusted relative risk per quintile and (in parenthesis) 95% confidence interval were: for protein, 1.06 (0.94-1.20); saturated fat, 0.99 (0.89-1.11); monounsaturated fat, 0.97 (0.88-1.07), polyunsaturated fat, 1.05 (0.97-1.13); and total carbohydrates, 1.03 (0.94-1.12). In alternative analytical approaches only total protein appeared to be positively associated to the occurrence of breast cancer with some consistency, but the results were far from statistically significant. These findings do not support a role for fat or other energy-generating nutrients in the aetiology of breast cancer.
希腊饮食的特点是总脂肪摄入量高,但饱和脂肪摄入量低。在雅典进行的一项基于医院的女性乳腺癌病例对照研究(1989 - 1991年)中,将820例确诊为乳腺癌的患者与795名骨科患者对照和753名医院访客对照进行比较,这些对照按年龄和访谈者与病例进行匹配。通过半定量食物频率问卷确定饮食情况;根据每种特定食物选定的典型份量的营养成分估算宏量营养素摄入量,并将所有项目的摄入量相加。使用逻辑回归分析数据,控制乳腺癌的人口统计学和生殖风险因素以及总能量摄入和营养素之间的相互混杂影响。总蛋白质、总脂肪、脂肪类别或总碳水化合物与乳腺癌风险之间没有显著或提示性关联。因此,每五分位数相互调整后的相对风险及(括号内)95%置信区间为:蛋白质,1.06(0.94 - 1.20);饱和脂肪,0.99(0.89 - 1.11);单不饱和脂肪,0.97(0.88 - 1.07),多不饱和脂肪,1.05(0.97 - 1.13);总碳水化合物,1.03(0.94 - 1.12)。在其他分析方法中,只有总蛋白质似乎在一定程度上与乳腺癌的发生呈正相关,但结果远未达到统计学显著水平。这些发现不支持脂肪或其他产生能量的营养素在乳腺癌病因学中起作用。