Franceschi S, Favero A, Decarli A, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Ferraroni M, Russo A, Salvini S, Amadori D, Conti E, Montella M, Giacosa A
Servizio di Epidemiologia, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy.
Lancet. 1996 May 18;347(9012):1351-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91008-9.
The association between risk of breast cancer and dietary fat and intakes of other energy sources remains controversial. The Italian population offers special opportunities to assess the influence of high intakes of unsaturated fat and starch and, because the population has low awareness of diet and cancer issues, there is less scope for recall bias. We have assessed the relations of various macronutrient intakes with risk of breast cancer.
In this case-control study, 2569 women with incident breast cancer (median age 55 years) and 2588 control women (median age 56 years) in hospital with acute, non-neoplastic diseases, were interviewed in six different areas of Italy between 1991 and 1994. A validated food-frequency questionnaire was used. It included questions on 78 foods and recipes grouped into six sections, as well as specific questions on individual fat intake pattern.
The risk of breast cancer decreased with increasing total fat intake (trend p 0.01) whereas the risk increased with increasing intake of available carbohydrates (trend p = 0.002). The odds ratios for women in the highest compared with the lowest quintile of energy-adjusted intake were 0.81 for total fat and 1.30 for available carbohydrates. Starch was the chief contributor to the positive association with available carbohydrates. High intakes of polyunsaturated and unsaturated fatty acids (i.e., polyunsaturated fatty acids plus oleic acid) were associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer (odds ratios for highest vs lowest quintile 0.70 and 0.74, respectively). Conversely, the intakes of saturated fatty acids, protein, and fibre were not significantly associated with breast-cancer risk.
This case-controls study shows that unsaturated fatty acids protect against breast cancer, possibly because intake of these nutrients is closely correlated with a high intake of raw vegetables. The findings also suggest a possible risk in southern European populations, of reliance on a diet largely based on starch.
乳腺癌风险与膳食脂肪及其他能量来源的摄入量之间的关联仍存在争议。意大利人群为评估高不饱和脂肪和淀粉摄入量的影响提供了特殊契机,而且由于该人群对饮食和癌症问题的认知度较低,回忆偏倚的可能性较小。我们评估了各种宏量营养素摄入量与乳腺癌风险之间的关系。
在这项病例对照研究中,1991年至1994年间,在意大利的六个不同地区对2569例新发乳腺癌女性(中位年龄55岁)和2588例因急性非肿瘤性疾病住院的对照女性(中位年龄56岁)进行了访谈。使用了一份经过验证的食物频率问卷。它包括关于78种食物和食谱的问题,这些食物和食谱分为六个部分,以及关于个体脂肪摄入模式的具体问题。
乳腺癌风险随总脂肪摄入量的增加而降低(趋势p<0.01),而风险随可利用碳水化合物摄入量的增加而增加(趋势p = 0.002)。能量调整摄入量最高五分位数与最低五分位数的女性相比,总脂肪的优势比为0.81,可利用碳水化合物的优势比为1.30。淀粉是与可利用碳水化合物呈正相关的主要因素。多不饱和脂肪酸和不饱和脂肪酸(即多不饱和脂肪酸加油酸)的高摄入量与乳腺癌风险降低相关(最高五分位数与最低五分位数的优势比分别为0.70和0.74)。相反,饱和脂肪酸、蛋白质和纤维的摄入量与乳腺癌风险无显著关联。
这项病例对照研究表明,不饱和脂肪酸可预防乳腺癌,可能是因为这些营养素的摄入与大量生食蔬菜的摄入密切相关。研究结果还表明,南欧人群大量依赖以淀粉为主的饮食可能存在风险。