Bartholomew R E
Department of Anthropology and Sociology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Psychol Med. 1994 May;24(2):281-306. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700027288.
This study questions the widely held assumption that the phenomenon known as mass psychogenic illness (MPI) exists per se in nature as a psychiatric disorder. Most MPI studies are problematical, being descriptive, retrospective investigations of specific incidents which conform to a set of pre-existing symptom criteria that are used to determine the presence of collective psychosomatic illness. Diagnoses are based upon subjective, ambiguous categories that reflect stereotypes of female normality which assume the presence of a transcultural disease or disorder entity, underemphasizing or ignoring the significance of episodes as culturally conditioned roles of social action. Examples of this bias include the mislabelling of dancing manias, tarantism and demonopathy in Europe since the Middle Ages as culture-specific variants of MPI. While 'victims' are typified as mentally disturbed females possessing abnormal personality characteristics who are exhibiting cathartic reactions to stress, it is argued that episodes may involve normal, rational people who possess unfamiliar conduct codes, world-views and political agendas that differ significantly from those of Western-trained investigators who often judge these illness behaviours independent of their local context and meanings.
本研究对一种广泛持有的假设提出了质疑,该假设认为被称为群体性心因性疾病(MPI)的现象本身作为一种精神疾病存在于自然之中。大多数MPI研究存在问题,它们是对符合一组预先存在的症状标准的特定事件进行描述性、回顾性调查,这些标准用于确定集体身心疾病的存在。诊断基于主观、模糊的类别,这些类别反映了女性正常状态的刻板印象,假定存在一种跨文化的疾病或障碍实体,而忽视或忽略了这些事件作为社会行为的文化条件作用的重要性。这种偏见的例子包括自中世纪以来欧洲将舞蹈狂、毒蛛症和魔症误称为MPI的特定文化变体。虽然“受害者”被典型地描述为具有异常人格特征的精神错乱女性,她们正在对压力做出宣泄反应,但有人认为,这些事件可能涉及正常、理性的人,他们拥有与西方训练的调查人员截然不同的行为准则、世界观和政治议程,而西方训练的调查人员往往在不考虑当地背景和意义的情况下判断这些疾病行为。