• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patients' rights after health care reform: who decides what is medically necessary?医疗改革后的患者权利:谁来决定什么是医疗必需的?
Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1515-20. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1515.
2
Patients' rights to care under Clinton's Health Security Act: the structure of reform.克林顿《健康保障法案》下患者的医疗护理权:改革架构
Am J Public Health. 1994 Aug;84(8):1330-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.8.1330.
3
President Clinton's proposal for health care reform: key provisions and issues.克林顿总统的医疗保健改革提案:关键条款与问题。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;45(9):871-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.45.9.871.
4
Clinton's health reform plan: an assessment from the right.克林顿的医疗改革计划:右派的评估。
J Med Assoc Ga. 1993 Nov;82(11):589, 591.
5
Patients' rights proposals: the insurers' perspective.
JAMA. 1999 Mar 3;281(9):858.
6
Health care reform: managed competition and beyond.医疗保健改革:管理式竞争及其他。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1993 Mar(135):1-33.
7
An American approach to health system reform.美国的医疗体系改革之路。
JAMA. 1991 May 15;265(19):2537-40.
8
President Clinton's managed competition proposal.克林顿总统的管理式竞争提案。
J Natl Med Assoc. 1993 Apr;85(4):257-63.
9
Clinton, health care, and the crystal ball. With the Democrats back in power, where do we go from here?
J Health Care Mark. 1996 Winter;16(4):6-13.
10
Coverage of genetic technologies under national health reform.国家医疗改革对基因技术的覆盖范围。
Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Nov;55(5):1054-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical necessity and defined coverage benefits in the Oregon Health Plan.俄勒冈健康计划中的医疗必要性和规定的承保福利。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Jun;87(6):1053-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.6.1053.
2
Rationing health care and the need for credible scarcity: why Americans can't say no.医疗资源配给与可信的稀缺性需求:为何美国人无法拒绝。
Am J Public Health. 1995 Oct;85(10):1439-45. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.10.1439.

本文引用的文献

1
The overdiagnosis of Lyme disease.莱姆病的过度诊断
JAMA. 1993 Apr 14;269(14):1812-6.
2
Cancer statistics, 1993.1993年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 1993 Jan-Feb;43(1):7-26. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.43.1.7.
3
Do the poor sue more? A case-control study of malpractice claims and socioeconomic status.穷人起诉的情况更多吗?一项关于医疗事故索赔与社会经济地位的病例对照研究。
JAMA. 1993 Oct 13;270(14):1697-701. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.14.1697.
4
Medical technology assessment and practice guidelines: their day in court.医疗技术评估与实践指南:它们在法庭上的情况。
Am J Public Health. 1993 Nov;83(11):1635-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.11.1635.
5
The framework of health care reform.医疗保健改革的框架
N Engl J Med. 1993 Nov 25;329(22):1666-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199311253292228.
6
Patients' rights to care under Clinton's Health Security Act: the structure of reform.克林顿《健康保障法案》下患者的医疗护理权:改革架构
Am J Public Health. 1994 Aug;84(8):1330-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.8.1330.
7
Concepts of disease: logical features and social implications.疾病概念:逻辑特征与社会影响
Perspect Biol Med. 1972 Summer;15(4):583-616. doi: 10.1353/pbm.1972.0006.
8
What is inappropriate care?什么是不恰当的护理?
JAMA. 1988;260(4):540-1.
9
Physicians' attitudes toward using deception to resolve difficult ethical problems.医生对于使用欺骗手段解决棘手伦理问题的态度。
JAMA. 1989 May 26;261(20):2980-5.
10
Defining experimental therapy--a third-party payer's dilemma.定义实验性治疗——第三方支付者的困境。
N Engl J Med. 1990 Dec 13;323(24):1702-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199012133232411.

医疗改革后的患者权利:谁来决定什么是医疗必需的?

Patients' rights after health care reform: who decides what is medically necessary?

作者信息

Mariner W K

机构信息

School of Public Health, Boston University, MA 02118-2394.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1515-20. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1515.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.84.9.1515
PMID:8092386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1615162/
Abstract

President Clinton's Health Security Act entitles individuals not to unlimited health care, but to a package of defined insurance benefits with specific exclusions and limitations. Like virtually all reform proposals, it would limit covered benefits to services that are medically necessary. If health reform is to control costs, not all medically necessary care can be covered. In the absence of a generally accepted definition of medical necessity, many services will not be guaranteed to all patients unless they are explicitly covered in the federal legislation or regulations. Without a federal definition of medical necessity or regulations listing covered services, health insurance plans will retain the primary authority to decide what is medically necessary for their patient subscribers.

摘要

克林顿总统的《健康保障法案》赋予个人的并非无限制的医疗保健,而是一套明确规定的保险福利,其中包含特定的除外责任和限制条款。与几乎所有的改革提议一样,该法案将承保福利限制在医疗必需的服务上。如果医疗改革要控制成本,就无法涵盖所有医疗必需的护理。在缺乏普遍接受的医疗必要性定义的情况下,许多服务无法保证提供给所有患者,除非它们在联邦立法或法规中得到明确涵盖。如果没有联邦对医疗必要性的定义或列出承保服务的法规,医疗保险计划将保留决定其参保患者所需医疗服务的主要权力。