Suppr超能文献

医疗改革后的患者权利:谁来决定什么是医疗必需的?

Patients' rights after health care reform: who decides what is medically necessary?

作者信息

Mariner W K

机构信息

School of Public Health, Boston University, MA 02118-2394.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1515-20. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1515.

Abstract

President Clinton's Health Security Act entitles individuals not to unlimited health care, but to a package of defined insurance benefits with specific exclusions and limitations. Like virtually all reform proposals, it would limit covered benefits to services that are medically necessary. If health reform is to control costs, not all medically necessary care can be covered. In the absence of a generally accepted definition of medical necessity, many services will not be guaranteed to all patients unless they are explicitly covered in the federal legislation or regulations. Without a federal definition of medical necessity or regulations listing covered services, health insurance plans will retain the primary authority to decide what is medically necessary for their patient subscribers.

摘要

克林顿总统的《健康保障法案》赋予个人的并非无限制的医疗保健,而是一套明确规定的保险福利,其中包含特定的除外责任和限制条款。与几乎所有的改革提议一样,该法案将承保福利限制在医疗必需的服务上。如果医疗改革要控制成本,就无法涵盖所有医疗必需的护理。在缺乏普遍接受的医疗必要性定义的情况下,许多服务无法保证提供给所有患者,除非它们在联邦立法或法规中得到明确涵盖。如果没有联邦对医疗必要性的定义或列出承保服务的法规,医疗保险计划将保留决定其参保患者所需医疗服务的主要权力。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Cancer statistics, 1993.1993年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 1993 Jan-Feb;43(1):7-26. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.43.1.7.
5
The framework of health care reform.医疗保健改革的框架
N Engl J Med. 1993 Nov 25;329(22):1666-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199311253292228.
7
Concepts of disease: logical features and social implications.疾病概念:逻辑特征与社会影响
Perspect Biol Med. 1972 Summer;15(4):583-616. doi: 10.1353/pbm.1972.0006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验