Suppr超能文献

麻醉患者中动脉张力测量法与桡动脉导管测量血压的比较。

Comparison of arterial tonometry with radial artery catheter measurements of blood pressure in anesthetized patients.

作者信息

Siegel L C, Brock-Utne J G, Brodsky J B

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305-5117.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1994 Sep;81(3):578-84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199409000-00009.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Arterial tonometry has been introduced for continuous noninvasive measurement of blood pressure. The accuracy of this method depends on the performance of two components: a piezoelectric crystal array and an oscillometric cuff. This study evaluates overall performance of arterial tonometry in terms of the performance of these two components by comparing it with simultaneous recording of blood pressure from an intraarterial catheter.

METHODS

Seventeen adult patients were studied during general anesthesia. Blood pressure was measured with an intraarterial catheter and with an arterial tonometry system. Analog pressure waveforms were sampled at 100 Hz. Blood pressure measurements obtained by oscillometry were recorded by computer. Comparisons of mean blood pressure on a beat-by-beat basis were made with and without correction for the calibration error introduced by oscillometry.

RESULTS

The difference between pairs of blood pressure determined by arterial tonometry and intraarterial measurement was 1.3 +/- 9.4 mmHg (mean +/- SD, bias +/- precision) with 88,158 pairs of measurements. The difference between blood pressure determined by oscillometry and intraarterial measurement was 2.4 +/- 7.5 mmHg (mean +/- SD) with 401 comparisons. After correcting for calibration error, the difference between the tonometry measurements and intraarterial measurements was -1.0 +/- 5.6 mmHg. Continuous episodes of discrepancy from intraarterial measurements in excess of 10 mmHg and lasting 5-60 s occurred 4.6 +/- 0.8 times per hour with tonometry and 12.6 +/- 1.4 times per hour with oscillometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies in blood pressure readings by arterial tonometry versus intraarterial measurement result from both the piezoelectric crystal array and the oscillometry used for calibration. Accuracy for individual measurement is inferior to oscillometry alone. The ability to detect significant changes of blood pressure more rapidly than with oscillometry alone is limited by the accuracy of the piezoelectric crystal component but is enhanced by the reduced interval between measurements.

摘要

背景

动脉张力测量法已被用于连续无创血压测量。该方法的准确性取决于两个组件的性能:一个压电晶体阵列和一个示波袖带。本研究通过将动脉张力测量法与动脉内导管同步记录的血压进行比较,从这两个组件的性能方面评估动脉张力测量法的整体性能。

方法

对17名成年患者在全身麻醉期间进行研究。使用动脉内导管和动脉张力测量系统测量血压。模拟压力波形以100Hz的频率进行采样。通过示波法获得的血压测量值由计算机记录。在有和没有校正示波法引入的校准误差的情况下,逐搏进行平均血压比较。

结果

在88158对测量中,动脉张力测量法与动脉内测量法确定的血压对之间的差异为1.3±9.4mmHg(平均值±标准差,偏差±精密度)。在401次比较中,示波法与动脉内测量法确定的血压差异为2.4±7.5mmHg(平均值±标准差)。在校正校准误差后,张力测量法测量值与动脉内测量值之间的差异为-1.0±5.6mmHg。动脉张力测量法每小时出现超过10mmHg且持续5 - 60秒的与动脉内测量值的连续差异发作次数为4.6±0.8次,示波法为每小时12.6±1.4次。

结论

动脉张力测量法与动脉内测量法的血压读数差异来自压电晶体阵列和用于校准的示波法。单次测量的准确性低于单独的示波法。与单独的示波法相比,更快速检测血压显著变化的能力受到压电晶体组件准确性的限制,但通过缩短测量间隔而得到增强。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验